摘要目的 比较使用"计量型"饮水机进行水化治疗方案与常规水化治疗方案在CCU对患者实施规范水化治疗的效果.方法 将204例冠脉介入治疗患者通过使用随机数字表随机分为观察组与对照组各102例,观察组使用自制"计量型"饮水机,按照规范要求制定饮水方案;对照组使用常规饮水水化治疗护理方案.比较两组患者规范饮水合格率、患者满意度及3 d后患者肾功能、对比剂肾病发生率.结果 观察组患者按规定饮水合格102例,合格率为100.00%,对照组按规定饮水合格68例,合格率为66.67%,观察组患者饮水合格率高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(χ2=38.4,P<0.01).观察组2例、对照组8例发生对比剂肾病,差异具有统计学意义(χ2=4.2,P=0.04).结论 应用"计量型"饮水机对CCU行冠脉介入治疗患者进行水化治疗的同时并辅以多元化宣教,效果满意.

abstractsObjective To compare the effects of fluid therapy by "measurement" water dispenser and routine fluid therapy on standard fluid therapy among patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in coronary care unit (CCU). Methods A total of 204 patients with PCI were divided into observation group (n=102) and control group (n=102) by random number table. Patients in the observation group received drinking water plan according to regulatory requirements using the self-designed "measurement" water dispenser. Patients in the control group accepted nursing plan of routine drinking fluid therapy. This study compared the qualified rate of standardized drinking water, patient satisfaction, renal function and the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) three days after intervention between two groups. Results There were 102 (100.00%) qualified patients drinking water according to stipulations in the observation group, while there were 68 (66.67%) in the control group. The qualified rate of drinking water in the observation group was higher than that in the control group with a significant difference (χ2=38.4, P<0.01). There were two patients with contrast induced nephropathy in the observation group, and eight patients with contrast induced nephropathy in the control group (χ2=4.2,P=0.04). Conclusions The effect of fluid therapy by "measurement" water dispenser supplemented with diversified education is satisfactory among patients with PCI in CCU.