医学文献 >>
  • 检索发现
  • 增强检索
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
默认
×
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

快速康复对胰十二指肠切除患者术后早期血栓风险的影响

Effects of enhanced recovery nursing on early postoperative vein thromboembolism risk after pancreaticoduodenectomy

摘要目的?探讨快速康复护理对胰十二指肠切除患者术后早期血栓风险的影响.方法?采用便利抽样,以2016年9月—2017年3月采取传统护理方式的45例胰十二指肠切除术患者作为对照组,以2017年3月—2018年6月实施快速康复护理的66例胰十二指肠切除术患者作为干预组.收集术前、术后即刻、术后第1天、术后第2天、术后第3天、术后第7天D-二聚体值,比较两组术后D-二聚体值及症状性血栓发生率.结果?干预组术后即刻、术后第1天、术后第2天、术后第3天、术后第7天D-二聚体值分别为(2.74±2.31)、(3.31±2.03)、(3.98±3.10)、(4.30±2.89)、(7.46±3.90)mg/L·FEU,对照组术后各时间点D-二聚体分别为(2.88±1.92)、(3.77±2.72)、(4.37±2.70)、(4.08±1.81)、(6.85±4.07)mg/L·FEU,两组术后D-二聚体值整体呈上升趋势,但两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);重复测量方差分析结果显示,两组术后D-二聚体组间效应(F=0.03,P=0.87)及交互效应(F=1.01,P=0.38)差异无统计学意义,时间效应(F=108.28,P<0.05)差异有统计学意义.两组患者症状性血栓发生率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.87,P>0.05).结论?胰十二指肠切除术后早期血栓风险持续增高,且快速康复护理较传统方式在改善胰十二指肠切除术后早期血栓风险方面无明显优势.

更多

abstractsObjective? To explore the effects of enhanced recovery nursing on early postoperative vein thromboembolism (VTE) risk after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Methods? Using convenience sampling method, the 45 cases of PD patients with traditional nursing methods from September 2016 to March 2017 were assigned as the control group, and the 66 cases of PD patients with enhanced recovery nursing from March 2017 to June 2018 were assigned as intervention group. The plasma D-dimer level before operation, immediately after operation, and in different postoperative days (POD): POD1, POD2, POD3 and POD7 were collected. The D-dimer level and the incidence rates of symptomatic VTE were compared between two groups. Results? The D-dimer values of the intervention group immediately after surgery, POD1, POD2, POD3 and POD7 were (2.74±2.31), (3.31±2.03), (3.98±3.10), (4.30±2.89) and (7.46±3.90) mg/L·FEU. The D-dimer of the control group at each postoperative time point were (2.88±1.92), (3.77±2.72), (4.37±2.70), (4.08±1.81) and (6.85±4.07) mg/L·FEU. The overall D-dimer value of the two groups showed an upward trend after operation,but there was no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05). Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that there were no differences in between-group effect (F=0.03, P=0.87) or interaction effect (F=1.01,P=0.38) of D-Dimer, while the difference in intra-group effect was statistically significant (F=108.28, P< 0.05). There was no statistical significance in the difference of the incidence rates of symptomatic VTE between two groups (χ2=0.87, P> 0.05). Conclusions? The early postoperative VTE risk after PD gradually increased, and the enhanced recovery nursing show no significantly advantage in VTE risk reduction after PD compared to traditional methods.

More
广告
  • 浏览152
  • 下载390
中华现代护理杂志

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

法律状态公告日 法律状态 法律状态信息

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new医文AI 翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷