摘要目的:探讨高效蒸汽清洗机在脑压管清洗中的应用效果。方法:选取郑州大学第一附属医院消毒供应中心一部于2019年10月1日—2020年3月31日回收的3 000个脑压管进行分析。依据不同清洗方式分为观察组、对照组A与对照组B，每组1 000个。观察组采用酶液浸泡联合高效蒸汽清洗机清洗，对照组A采用酶液浸泡清洗，对照组B使用酶液浸泡联合超声清洗机清洗。比较3种清洗方式的清洗时间、清洗合格数量、清洗安全、残留气体及物品损伤情况。结果:观察组脑压管的清洗时间为（8.75±1.16）min，低于对照组A的（12.38±1.35）min及对照组B的（10.17±2.09）min，差异有统计学意义（ P<0.01）。观察组脑压管的清洗合格数量、清洗安全数量多于对照组A和对照组B，差异有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。观察组脑压管的残留气体与物品损伤数量少于对照组A和对照组B，差异有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。 结论:高效蒸汽清洗机清洗脑压管的效果较好，宜于推广应用。

abstractsObjective:To explore the application effect of high-efficiency steam cleaner in cleaning cerebral pressure tube.Methods:A total of 3 000 cerebral pressure tubes recovered in the First Department of Disinfection and Supply Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from October 1, 2019, to March 31, 2020, were selected for analysis. According to different cleaning methods, they were divided into the observation group, the control group A and control group B, with 1 000 in each group. The observation group used enzyme solution immersion combined with the high-efficiency steam cleaner to clean, the control group A used enzyme solution immersion to clean, and the control group B used enzyme solution immersion combined with the ultrasonic cleaner to clean. The cleaning time, qualified cleaning quantity, cleaning safety, residual gas and item damage of the three cleaning methods were compared.Results:The cleaning time of cerebral pressure tubes in the observation group was (8.75±1.16) min, which was lower than that of the control group A (12.38±1.35) min and the control group B (10.17±2.09) min, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.01) . The number of qualified and safe cleaning of cerebral pressure tubes in the observation group was more than those of the control group A and the control group B, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05) . The amount of residual gas and the number of goods damaged of the cerebral pressure tubes in the observation group were less than those of the control group A and the control group B, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05) . Conclusions:The high-efficiency steam cleaner has a better effect on cleaning the cerebral pressure tube and is suitable for popularization and application.