摘要目的:自行设计一种连续性肾脏替代治疗（CRRT）废液袋处理车，探讨其在临床实践中的应用效果。方法:采用便利抽样法，选取2024年2月浙江省中医院重症监护病房CRRT过程中产生的100个废液袋为研究对象；采用随机数字表法将废液袋分为观察组（ n=50）和对照组（ n=50）。对照组采用传统方法进行处理，观察组采用CRRT废液袋处理车进行处理。比较两组单袋废液排空耗时、单位面积内喷溅点数和操作人员满意度。 结果:观察组废液袋单袋排空耗时低于对照组[（38.34±1.98） vs.（315.46±11.23）s， P<0.01]；观察组5 cm×5 cm单位面积内废液喷溅点数少于对照组[（0.28±0.09） vs.（8.62±0.64）个， P<0.01]；观察组操作人员满意度得分高于对照组[（4.88±0.05） vs.（1.44±0.10）分， P<0.01]。 结论:CRRT废液袋处理车可以降低废液袋排空耗时和排放过程中对周围环境的污染，提高操作人员满意度，值得在临床实践中推广使用。

abstractsObjective:To design a continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) waste liquid bag disposal vehicle and explore its effectiveness.Methods:In February 2024, convenience sampling was used to select 100 waste liquid bags generated during CRRT in the ICU of Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine as research subjects. The waste liquid bags were divided into an observational group ( n=50) and a control group ( n=50) using a random number table method. The control group was treated using usual method, while the observational group was treated using a CRRT waste liquid bag disposal vehicle. The emptying time of a single bag of waste liquid, the number of splashes per unit area, and operator satisfaction were compared between two groups. Results:The emptying time of a single waste liquid bag in the observational group was lower than that in the control group [ (38.34±1.98) vs. (315.46±11.23) s, P<0.01]. The number of splashes per unit area of 5 cm × 5 cm in the observational group was less than that in the control group [ (0.28±0.09) vs. (8.62±0.64), P<0.01]. The operator satisfaction score of the observational group was higher than that of the control group [ (4.88±0.05) vs. (1.44±0.10) points, P<0.01] . Conclusions:The CRRT waste liquid bag disposal vehicle can reduce the emptying time of waste liquid bags and the pollution to the surrounding environment during the discharge process, improve operator satisfaction, and is worthy of promotion in clinical practice.