• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

眼前段光学相干断层扫描仪与超声生物显微镜测量中央前房深度的比较

Measurement of central anterior chamber depth with anterior segment optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound biomicroscope

摘要目的 比较眼前段光学相干断层扫描仪(AS-OCT)与超声生物显微镜(UBM)测量中央前房深度(ACD)的差异和两者的可重复性.方法 分别用AS-OCT和UBM测量急性原发性闭角型青光眼(APACG)患者29例55眼(发作眼32眼,未发作眼23眼),慢性原发性闭角型青光眼(CPACG)患者4l例74眼的ACD.采用配对t检验进行不同仪器ACD测量值比较;相关分析法分析两种仪器测量值之间的相关性.完全随机法选择1只眼分别用AS-OCT和UBM依次重复测量ACD 10次,比较测量的可重复性.结果 APACG发作眼用AS-OCT测量的ACD值与UBM的测量值之间差异无统计学意义.APACG对侧眼、CPACG眼的AS-OCT测量值比UBM测量值大[(1.923+0.287)mm比(1.860±0.243)mm,(2.017±0.054)mm比(1.913±0.052)mm,均P=0.012].AS-OCT和UBM的ACD测量值呈正相关(r=0.928,P<0.001).AS-OCT与UBM测量ACD的变异系数分别为0.66%和0.82%.结论 AS-OCT比UBM测量的ACD值大,两种仪器测量值相关性良好.AA-OCT的可重复性优于UBM.

更多

abstractsObjective To compare the difference and repeatability between anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscope (UBM) in measuring central anterior chamber depth (ACD). Methods Twenty-nine patients (32 attacked eyes and 23 unaffected fellow eyes) with acute primary angle closure glaucoma (APACG) and 41 patients (74 eyes) with chronic primary angle closure glaucoma (CPACG) were included in this study. AS-OCT and UBM were used to measure the ACD of these APACG and CPACG subjects. Pair sample t test and correlation analysis were introduced to analyze the difference and correlation of the ACD values between the 2 instruments. ACD of one complete randomly selected eye was measured 10 times by the above 2 instruments, respectively, and the repeatability of 2 instruments was analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in ACD values of attacked eyes of APACG between AS-OCT and UBM. In unaffected fellow eyes and CPACG eyes, the ACD values measured by AS-OCT were deeper than that measured by UBM[ (1.923±0.287) mm vs (1.860±0.243) mm, (2.017±0.054) mm vs (1.913±0.052) mm, both P=0.012]. Positive correlation between AS-OCT and UBM in measuring ACD was found (r=0.928, P<0.001). The coefficient of variation of ACD was 0.66% as measured by AS-OCT, and 0.82% as by UBM. Conclusions The ACD measured by AS-OCT can be deeper than that by UBM. Excellent correlation is found between AS-OCT and UBM measurements. AS-OCT appears to be more repeatable in measuring ACD than UBM.

More
广告
  • 浏览520
  • 下载200
中华生物医学工程杂志

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷