上段输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石前行静脉尿路造影的价值
Value of intravenous urography before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of proximal ureteral calculi
摘要目的 探讨上段输尿管结石经体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)治疗前行静脉尿路造影(IVU)检查的价值.方法 将腹部X线平片(KUB)证实为X线不透光的结石和超声检查无严重肾积水的单发上段输尿管结石100例患者随机分为两组,每组50例.IVU组ESWL前行IVU检查,对照组ESWL前不行IVU检查.观察ESWL治疗后并发症、结石清除率.结果 IVU组有7例退出研究.对照组和IVU组结石清除率分别为86.0%(43150)和83.7%(36/43);治疗成功率分别为94.0%(47/50)和95.3%(41/43);并发症发生率分别为26.0%(13/50)和27.9%(12/43),两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 KUB证实为x线不透光的结石和超声检查无严重肾积水的单发上段输尿管结石患者,ESWL治疗前无需行IVU检查,这样可减少放射线暴露、避免造影剂的毒副作用并节省医疗费用.
更多相关知识
abstractsObjective To study the impact of preprocedure intravenous urography (IVU) on the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL) for proximal ureteral stones.Methods One hundred patients with solitary radiopaque proximal ureteral stones on plain radiographs and no severe hydronephrosis on ultrasonographic examination were allocated randomly to two treatment groups.IVU group (n=50) had IVU before the start of ESWL,whereas patients in control group (n=50) underwent ESWL without IVU.Postop- erative success,the stone-free rates and complications were evaluated in both groups. Results Seven patients in IVU group were excluded from the study. The success rate [95.3%(41/43) in IVU group vs 94.0% (47/50) in control group],stone-free rate [83.7% (36/43)vs 86.0% (43/50)] and complication rate[27.9% (12/43 ) vs 26.0% (13/50)]were similar in two groups (P>0.05).Conclusions It is not necessary to obtain an IVU for patients who have solitary radiopaque proximal ureteral calculi on plain radiographs with no severe hydronephrosis on uhrasonographie examination before scheduling them for ESWL,thus minimizing the cost,avoiding exposure to contrast medium,and reducing radiation exposure.
More相关知识
- 浏览286
- 被引0
- 下载4

相似文献
- 中文期刊
- 外文期刊
- 学位论文
- 会议论文