• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

激光前弹力层下角膜磨镶术与透镜取出术术后早期视力比较

Comparison of the short-term visual acuity between sub-Bowman's keratectomy and femtosecond samll incision lenticule extraction

摘要目的 比较准分子激光前弹力层下角膜磨镶术(SBK)与飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(SMILE)术后早期视力及残余屈光度.方法 前瞻性研究.近视及近视散光60例(120只眼),SBK和SMILE两种手术各30例(60只眼).比较两组术后1d、7d和1个月裸眼视力和残余屈光度.结果 术后1d和7 d SBK组裸眼视力≥1.0者分别占85.0%和95.0%,明显多于SMILE组的48.3%和81.7%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000和0.023);术后1个月SBK组裸眼视力≥1.0者占96.7%,与SMILE组的95.0%比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.648);术后1个月,SBK组有效指数为1.001 ±0.005,SMILE组有效指数为1.005±0.012,两组之间的差异无统计学意义(P=0.128).术后1个月,两组安全指数差异无统计学意义(P =0.547).术后1d、7d和1个月SBK组的残余屈光度(等效球镜度)依次为(0.376 ±0.471)D、(0.070 ±0.413)D和(0.185±0.292)D,SMILE组分别为(-0.073 ±0.433)D、(0.006 ±0.338)D和(0.079±0.270)D,SBK组和SMILE组残余屈光度(等效球镜)比较术后1d和1个月差异有统计学意义,而术后7d,差异无统计学意义(t=5.439、0.932、2.061,P=0.000、0.353、0.041).结论 SMILE术后早期残余屈光度与目标屈光度更为接近,但其视力恢复比SBK术稍慢.

更多

abstractsObjective To compare visual acuity and residual diopter after sub-Bowman's keratectomy (SBK) and femtosecond small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).Methods In this prospective,non-randomized observational study,120 eyes of 60 patients were included,60 eyes of 30 patients received SBK surgery as the SBK group,and 60 eyes of 30 patients received SMILE surgery as the SMILE group.The differences of the visual acuity and residual diopter between the two groups on 1 d,7 d and 1 month postoperatively were compared.Results At 1 day and 1 week postoperatively,the proportion of uncorrected visual acuity ≥ 1.0 in SBK group were 85.0% and 95.0%,more than that in group SMILE (48.3% and 81.7%),the differences was statistically significant (P =0.000 and 0.023).There were no statistically significant difference in uncorrected visual acuity between SBK (96.7%) and SMILE group (95.0%) at 1 month postoperatively (P =0.648).No statistically significant difference in efficacy index was found between the two groups at 1 month postoperathely (P =0.128).There was no statistically significant difference in safety index between the two groups at 1 month after surgery (P =0.547).At 1 day,1 week and 1 month postoperatively,the residual diopter in SBK group were (0.376 ±0.471) D,(0.070 ± 0.413) D and (0.185 ±0.292) D respectively.In the SMILE group the residual diopter were (-0.073 ± 0.433) D,(0.006± 0.338) D and (0.079 ± 0.270) D correspondingly.The residual diopter was statistically significant between the two groups at 1 day、1 month after surgery.There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at 1 week visit(t =5.439、0.932、2.061,P =0.000、0.353、0.041).Conclusion After SMILE,the consistency of residual diopter and objective diopter are better,but recovery of visual acuity is slightly slower than that of SBK.

More
广告
  • 浏览258
  • 下载93
中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷