医学文献 >>
  • 检索发现
  • 增强检索
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
默认
×
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

D-TBL与LBL在民族医学教学中实施效果比较

Comparison of the effect of D-TBL and LBL teaching methods in the teaching of national medicine

摘要目的 探讨任务驱动及团队合作学习(task-based learning and team-based learning,Double-TBL/D-TBL)与以教师讲授为主的教学(lecture-based learning,LBL)在民族医学教学中实施效果.方法 选择右江民族医学院同一学期进行授课的2012级临床本科(全科班)学生50人(D-TBL组)和2013级临床本科学生54人(LBL组)为研究对象.两组授课内容、使用教材、授课教师、学时数均相同.通过课堂测试、学生互评、问卷调查等方式评价效果.测试成绩采用SPSS 11.5软件建立数据库,行f检验.结果 D-TBL组学生主观题答对率高于LBL组答对率,差异具有统计学意义[(94.56±4.95)% vs.(29.26±12.15)%,t=36.382,P=0.000].D-TBL组学生个人测试答对率与LBL组客观题答对率[(75.20±11.82)% vs.(68.61±14.65)%,t=2.512,P=0.374]、D-TBL组小组测试答对率与LBL组客观题答对率[(84.25±13.08%) vs.(68.61±14.65)%,t=5.727,P=0.961],差异均无统计学意义.组内成员统计评分表显示,获得全A评价的学生有41人(85.42%),获得评价中含B的学生7人(14.58%),无学生获C评价.课堂反馈问卷调查表显示,喜欢D-TBL的学生40人(83.33%),喜欢LBL的学生26人(50.00%).结论 D-TBL组大部分学生较喜欢该教学,D-TBL与LBL在民族医学教学中不可互相取代,可根据两者各自的优点分配到教学的不同阶段.

更多

abstractsObjective To discuss task-based learning and team-based learning methods and lecture-based learning method in the class of ethnic medicine.Method 50 students in clinic medicine (general practice) of grade 2012 were selected as D-TBL group and 54 students in clinic medicine of grade 2013 were selected as LBL group.Both groups have teaching content,textbook,teachers,class hours in common.Effect of teaching was valued by tests,evaluation in students,questionnaires.SPSS was used to analyze scores of tests.T test was used.Results The correct answer rate?of subject items in D-TBL group was higher than that of LBL group and the difference had statistical significance [(94.56 ± 4.95)% vs.(29.26 ± 12.15)%,t=36.382,P=0.000).There was no significant difference between the correct answer rate of personal test in D-TBL group and objective item in the LBL group[(75.20 ± 11.82)% vs.(68.61 ± 14.65)%,t=2.512,P=0.374].There was no statistically significant difference between the correct answer rate of group test in D-TBL group and objective item in the LBL group[(84.25 ± 13.08)% vs.(68.61 ± 14.65)%,t=5.727,P=0.961].In Score table for members in every division,41(85.42%) students got straight A,7(14.58%) students got B and nobody got C.Feedback questionnaire showed 40(83.33%) students like D-TBL while 26(50.00%) students like LBL.Conclusion Most of students in D-TBL group like D-TBL.D-TBL and LBL cannot take the place of each other.In the future teaching,both methods should be used in different teaching periods according to their merits.

More
广告
  • 浏览116
  • 下载4
中华医学教育探索杂志

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

法律状态公告日 法律状态 法律状态信息

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new医文AI 翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷