摘要目的：比较手法复位夹板外固定与切开复位内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效。方法选取肱骨近端骨折患者62例，按数字表法随机分为两组，手法复位组31例，采用手法复位夹板外固定治疗；切开复位内固定组31例，采用切开复位内固定治疗。比较两组临床疗效。结果手法复位组平均愈合时间为（98．34±0．42）d，短于切开复位内固定组的（121．53±0．45）d（t＝209．76，P＜0．05）；手法复位组疼痛发生率为22．58％，优于切开复位内固定组的48．39％（χ2＝4．51，P＜0．05）；手法复位组优良率为96．77％，高于切开复位内固定组的80．65％（χ2＝4．03，P＜0．05）。结论采用手法复位夹板外固定治疗肱骨近端骨折，临床疗效优于切开复位内固定，是治疗肱骨近端骨折的可靠选择。

abstractsObjective To compare the clinical efficacy of manipulative reduction and splint external fixation and open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus .Methods 62 patients with proximal humeral fractures were randomly divided into the two groups .31 cases in the manipulation group re-ceived manual reduction and splint external fixation;31 patients in the open reduction and internal fixation group were treated by open reduction and internal fixation .The clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups .Results The average healing time of the manual reduction group was (98.34 ±0.42) d,which was shorter than (121.53 ± 0.45)d of open reduction and internal fixation group (t=209.76,P<0.05).The incidence rate of pain in the manu-al reduction group was 22.58%,which was lower than 48.39% in the open reduction and internal fixation group (χ2 =4.51,P<0.05).The excellent and good rate of the manual reduction group was 96.77%,which was higher than 80.65%of the open reduction and internal fixation group (χ2 =4.03,P<0.05).Conclusion The clinical curative effect of manual reduction and splint external fixation in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures is better than open reduction and internal fixation ,it is a reliable choice for treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus .