摘要目的 比较经后腹膜腔腹腔镜肾盂输尿管切开取石术与传统开放肾盂切开取石术的临床效果.方法 收集150例肾盂及输尿管结石患者,按照数字表法分为对照组与观察组,每组75例,其中对照组给予传统开放肾盂切开取石术治疗;观察组给予经后腹膜腔腹腔镜肾盂输尿管切开取石术治疗,比较两组的临床疗效.结果 治疗后,观察组临床有效率100.0％,对照组临床有效率92.0％,两组差异有统计学意义(x2 =10.31,P＜0.05);观察组手术时间(90±12) min、术中出血量(25±7)mL、住院时间(10±3)d,均优于对照组(t=7.24、8.31、7.61,均P＜0.05).结论 经后腹膜腔膜腔镜肾盂输尿管切开取石术具有疗效确切、创伤小、恢复快等优点,优于传统开放肾盂切开取石术,值得临床推广应用.

abstractsObjective To compare the clinical effects of peritoneal cavity after laparoscopic renal pelvis and ureter lithotomy and traditional open renal pelvis incision nephrolithotomy.Methods 150 cases with renal pelvis and ureteral calculi were randomly divided into control group and observation group with 75 cases in each group,the control group was given traditional open pyelolithotomy for treatment while the observation group was given peritoneal cavity after laparoscopic renal pelvis and ureter lithotomy for treatment,clinical efficacy of the two groups were compared.Results The clinical effective rate of the observation group after treatment was 100％,which that of the control group was 92％,there was significant differences between the two groups (x2 =10.31,P ＜ 0.05).The operation time in the observation group was (90 ± 12) min,amount of bleeding during operation was (25 ± 7) mL,hospital stays was (10 ± 3) d,which were better than those of the control group,there were significant differences between the two groups (t =7.24,8.31,7.61,all P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and ureterolithotomy is a minimally invasive operation,which has the advantages of definite curative effect,less trauma,less bleeding,rapid recovery,superior than the traditional open pyelolithotomy,so it is worthy of clinical application.