摘要NRS2002工具创始人Kondrup和Rasmussen在中华医学会肠外肠内营养学分会营养风险-不足-支持-结局-成本/效果多中心分享数据库协作组第42次、44次工作坊的报告中分别对NRS 2002工具的应用内涵和NRS 2002工具形成的循证基础及前瞻性临床有效性验证的方法学做了阐述，也对NRS 2002中营养受损部分达到3分可以用来评定营养不良做了说明。该营养不良评定方法虽简便易行，但不够全面，无法用于营养不良诊断。为解决营养不良诊断的一致性问题，2018年9月，美国肠外肠内营养学会与欧洲临床营养和代谢学会网站在线发表了由全球四大肠外肠内营养学会共同完成的全球(营养)领导层倡议营养不良诊断(Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition，GLIM)标准。随着我国依据疾病诊断相关分组支付医保费用的推行，应该在住院病案首页填写有中国版ICD-10(2016)代码的营养风险和营养不良的疾病名称。基于此，本文结合Kondrup和Rasmussen在北京和郑州的报告内容对《肠外肠内营养学名词-2019》中的营养风险筛查(NRS 2002)、营养不良诊断(GLIM)名词进行第一阶段解读。

abstractsIn the 42 nd and 44 th workshops of CSPEN-nutritional risk-undernutrition-support-outcome-cost effectiveness ratio (NUSOC) multi-center database collaboration group, Jens Kondrup and Henrik Rasmussen described again the application of NRS 2002, the evidence-based basis of NRS 2002 development and the methodology for prospective validation of clinical effectiveness. There is no gold standard for validation. They both considered that malnutrition could be identified as a score of 3 or more for impaired nutritional status in NRS 2002. Although NRS 2002 is simple and easy to be applied, it is not comprehensive enough for malnutrition diagnosis. ASPEN and ESPEN on-line published the Global Leadership (nutritional) Initiative on Malnutrition(GLIM)diagnosis criteria in September 2018. With the gradual implementation of medicare payment based on diagnosis related groups(DRG)in China, the nutritional risk and the malnutrition diagnosis with Chinese version of ICD-10 (2016) code should be recorded in the first page of the medical records. In this terminology interpretations, the terms of nutritional risk screening(NRS 2002.01.016)and malnutrition diagnosis (GLIM-phenotypic criteria 01.028, etiologic criteria 01.029) published in Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Terminology 2019 are discussed based on the reports given by Kondrup and Rasmussen in Beijing and Zhengzhou.