医学文献 >>
  • 检索发现
  • 增强检索
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
默认
×
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

Comparative efficacy and safety of cognitive enhancers for treating vascular cognitive impairment: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

摘要Objective: To assess and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of cognitive enhancers (donepezil, galan-tamine, rivastigmine, and memantine) on cognition, behavior, function, and global status in patients with vascular cognitive impairment. Data sources: The initial literature search was performed with PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Meth-odology Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cumulative Index to Nursing& Allied Health (CINAHL) from inception to January 2018 for studies regarding donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine for treatment of vascular cognitive impairment. Data selection: Randomized controlled trials on donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine as monotherapy in the treatment of vascular cognitive impairment were included. A Bayesian network me-ta-analysis was conducted. Outcome measures: Efficacy was assessed by changes in scores of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale, cognitive subscale, Mini-Mental State Examination, Neuropsychiatric Inventory scores and Clinician’s In-terview-Based Impression of Change Scale Plus Caregiver’s Input, Activities of Daily Living, the Clinical Dementia Rating scale. Safety was evaluated by mortality, total adverse events (TAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), nausea, vomiting. diarrhea, or cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs). Results: After screening 1717 citations, 12 randomized controlled trials were included. Donepezil and rivastigmine (mean difference (e) = –0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25–1.32; MD = 1.05, 95% CI:0.18–1.79) were significantly more effective than placebo in reducing Mini-Mental State Examination scores. Donepezil, galantamine, and memantine (MD = –1.30, 95% CI: –2.27 to –0.42; MD = –1.67, 95% CI: –3.36 to–0.06; MD = –2.27, 95% CI: –3.91 to –0.53) showed superior benefits on the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–cognitive scores compared with placebo. Memantine (MD = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.05–7.29) improved global status (Clinician’s Interview-Based Impression of Change Scale Plus Caregiver’s Input) more than the place-bo. Safety results revealed that donepezil 10 mg (odds ratio (OR) = 3.04, 95% CI: 1.86–5.41) contributed to higer risk of adverse events than placebo. Galantamine (OR = 5.64, 95% CI: 1.31–26.71) increased the risk of nausea. Rivastigmine (OR = 16.80, 95% CI: 1.78–319.26) increased the risk of vomiting. No agents displayed a significant risk of serious adverse events, mortality, cerebrovascular accidents, or diarrhea. Conclusion: We found significant efficacy of donepezil, galantamine, and memantine on cognition. Me-mantine can provide significant efficacy in global status. They are all safe and well tolerated.

更多
广告
作者单位 Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China [1]
栏目名称
DOI 10.4103/1673-5374.249228
发布时间 2019-12-26(万方平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)
基金项目
The study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province of China, (No. 20170541036 (to HYL).The funder had no role in the study design, conduction of experiment, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript)
提交
  • 浏览21
  • 下载9
中国神经再生研究(英文版)

中国神经再生研究(英文版)

2019年14卷5期

805-816页

SCIMEDLINEISTICCSCDCABP

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

法律状态公告日 法律状态 法律状态信息

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new医文AI 翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷