摘要Growth-associated protein 43 plays a key role in neurite outgrowth through cytoskeleton remodeling. We have previously demonstrated that structural damage of peripheral nerves induces growth-associated protein 43 upregulation to promote growth cone formation. Conversely, the limited regenerative capacity of the central nervous system due to an inhibitory environment prevents major changes in neurite outgrowth and should be presumably associated with lowlevels of growth-associated protein 43 expression. However, central alterations due to peripheral nerve damage have never been assessed using the growth-associated protein 43 marker. In this study, we used the tubulization technique to repair 1 cm-long nerve gaps in the rat nerve injury/repair model and detected growth-associated protein 43 expression in the peripheral and central nervous systems. First, histological analysis of the regeneration process confirmed an active regeneration process of the nerve gaps through the conduit from 10 days onwards. The growth-associated protein 43 expression profile varied across regions and follow-up times, from a localized expression to an abundant and consistent expression throughout the regeneration tissue, confirming the presence of an active nerve regeneration process. Second, spinal cord changes were also histologically assessed, and no apparent changes in the structural and cellular organization were observed using routine staining methods. Surprisingly, remarkable differences and local changes appeared in growth-associated protein 43 expression at the spinal cord level, in particular at 20 days post-repair and beyond. Growth-associated protein 43 protein was first localized in the gracile fasciculus and was homogeneously distributed in the left posterior cord. These findings differed from the growth-associated protein 43 pattern observed in the healthy control, which did not express growth-associated protein 43 at these levels. Our results revealed a differential expression in growth-associated protein 43 protein not only in the regenerating nerve tissue but also in the spinal cord after peripheral nerve transection. These findings open the possibility of using this marker to monitor changes in the central nervous system after peripheral nerve injury.