医学文献 >>
  • 检索发现
  • 增强检索
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
默认
×
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

θ短阵快速脉冲经颅磁刺激治疗首发抑郁症患者疗效及认知功能的对照研究

Antidepressant efficacy of theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment of first-episode depression:a randomized, double blind controlled trial

摘要目的 探讨重复经颅磁刺激θ短阵快速脉冲刺激(TBS)模式联合文拉法辛治疗对抑郁症首次发病患者疗效、认知功能及安全性的影响.方法 符合美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册第4版诊断标准的抑郁症首次发病患者43例,采用随机数字表法随机分为TBS组(21例)和伪刺激组(22例),2组患者均接受盐酸文拉法辛缓释片(150~ 300) mg/d治疗.TBS组接受左侧背外侧前额叶皮质经颅磁刺激,伪刺激组线圈放置与头皮呈90度,其他参数的设置与研究组一致,治疗4周.治疗前及治疗第2、4周末应用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-24)评估患者的临床症状,治疗前和治疗第4周末应用威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)和持续性操作测验(CPT)评估患者的执行功能和注意功能.结果 治疗前,TBS组与伪刺激组的HAMD评分差异无统计学意义[(38.2±7.1)vs.(37.5±6.8),t=0.314,P=0.754];治疗第2、4周末,TBS组HAMD评分减分值均高于对照组[(20.5±4.8)vs.(16.1±5.9),(30.3±5.2)vs.(26.0±6.3)],差异有统计学意义(t=2.547,P=0.015;t=2.318,P=0.026).治疗第2周末,TBS组显效率(57.9%)高于伪刺激组(25%),差异有统计学意义(x2=4.358,P=0.037);治疗第4周末,TBS组显效率为和治愈率(94.7%和78.9%)均高于伪刺激组(65%和45%),差异有统计学意义(x2=5.284,P=0.021;x2=4.744,P=0.029).治疗第4周末,TBS组WCST的完成分类数、正确应答数、错误应答数、持续性错误、非持续性错误的改善优于伪刺激组,CPT1、CPT2、CPT3的改善也优于伪刺激组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 相对于单一应用抗抑郁药物治疗,联合应用θ短阵快速脉冲经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症首次发病患者起效快,疗效好,对执行功能和注意功能改善更显著.

更多

abstractsObjective To evaluate the antidepressant efficacy,cognitive effect and safety of theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) in treatment of first-episode depression.Methods 43 hospitalized patients with first-episode depression meeting with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition (DSM-Ⅳ) were randomly divided into theta-burst stimulation group (TBS group,n=21) and sham-stimulation group(sham group,n=22).All patients were treated at left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for 4 weeks,and were concomitantly taking venlafaxine (150-300)mg/d.Hamilton Depression Scale-24 was used to assess the severity of depression before treatment,at week 2 and week 4 in both groups.Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and Continuous Performance Test (CPT) were used to estimate cognitive function of depression before and after treatment.Results There was no difference on HAMD score before treatment between two groups((38.2±7.1) vs.(37.5±6.8),t=0.314,P=0.754).The reduction of HAMD score in TBS group showed significantly faster than that in sham group at week 2 ((20.5±4.8)vs.(16.1±5.9),t=2.547,P=0.015) and week 4((30.3±5.2) vs.(26.0± 6.3),t=2.318,P=0.026).After 2-week stimulation,the response rate was higher in TBS group than that in sham group (57.9%vs.25%,x2 =4.358,P=0.037).The response and remission rates were significantly higher in TBS group than those in sham group after 4-week stimulation period (94.7%vs.65%,x2=5.284,P=0.021 ;78.9%vs.45%,x2=4.744,P=0.029).The improvements on WCST and CPT after treatment in TBS group,such as categories completed,correct responses,error responses,perseveiative responses errors,nonperseverative responses errors,CPT1,CPT2 and CPT3,were significant than those in sham group (P<0.05).Conclusions Theta-burst stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is safe and well-tolerated,while offering the potential to enhance early effects and modulate cognition in first-episode depressive patients.

More
广告
  • 浏览0
  • 下载0
中华行为医学与脑科学杂志

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

法律状态公告日 法律状态 法律状态信息

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new智医 翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷