摘要目的 对隐性不适应风格问卷(looming maladaptive style questionnaire,LMSQ-R)进行中文版修订,并考察其信度和效度.方法 用翻译的隐性不适应风格问卷(LMSQ-R)对284名大学生进行预备测试,另外对281名大学生进行隐性不适应风格问卷(LMSQ-R)、惧怕否定评价量表(fear of negative evaluation scale,FNE)、贝克焦虑量表(beck anxiety inventory,BAI)、贝克抑郁量表(Beck depression inventory,BDI)的测定.结果 ①修订的隐性不适应风格问卷具有较好的项目区分度,相关系数在0.606 ~ 0.708之间;②本问卷内部一致性信度为0.736,两个因子的内部一致性信度分别为0.593和0.636,重测信度在0.564~0.700之间;③验证性因素分析结果显示,根据理论构想的1阶6因素2阶2因素模型拟合良好;修订量表中各因子及总分之间的相关系数在0.527~ 0.872之间;LMSQ-R与三个校标量表FNE、BAI、BDI相关在0.193 ~ 0.476之间,结果均差异有统计学意义.结论 修订的隐性不适应风格问卷(LMSQ-R)在大学生中的信度和效度指标符合心理测量学的要求,可以作为隐性认知风格研究的一个有效工具.
更多相关知识
abstractsObjective To revise looming maladaptive style questionnaire(LMSQ-R) and examine its reliability and validity.Methods 284 undergraduates were measured preparedly with LMSQ-R,281 university students participated in a retest,using LMSQ-R,fear of negative evaluation scale (FNE),Beck anxiety inventory (BAI),Beck depression inventory (BDI).Results ①The item distinguish analysis was acceptable.②Reliability analysis confirmed that Cronbach α coefficient of LMSQ-R was 0.736,Cronbach α coefficient of the two subscales were 0.593 and 0.636.The test-retest reliability of LMSQ-R ranged from 0.564 to 0.700.③Confirmatory factor analysis suggested that the first order six factor-second order two factor model was perfect according to the evaluation criteria.The correlation coefficient between the two subscales was 0.527,the correlation coefficients among the two subscales and the total score ranged from 0.872 to 0.875.The correlation coefficients among the LMSQ-R and FNE,BAI,BDI ranged from 0.872 to 0.875,the results had statistical significance.Conclusion The revised LMSQ-R shows the satisfactory reliability and validity in university students.It can be used as a useful testing tool of LCS in psychological research.
More相关知识
- 浏览0
- 被引10
- 下载0

相似文献
- 中文期刊
- 外文期刊
- 学位论文
- 会议论文


换一批



