摘要目的:汉化替代性攻击问卷(displaced aggression questionnaire，DAQ)及分析替代性攻击问卷中文版(Chinese version of displaced aggression questionnaire，DAQ-CV)在大学生中的信度和效度。方法:抽取全国六所大学共计1 876名大学生，采用SPSS 24.0和Mplus 7.0进行了项目分析与探索性因素分析( n＝564)，验证性因素分析、相关分析、内部一致性信度和重测信度分析( n＝875)，以及效标关联效度、聚合效度和区分效度分析( n＝437)检验替代性攻击问卷中文版的信度与效度。 结果:探索性因素分析显示，DAQ-CV包括愤怒沉浸、复仇计划和行为替代性攻击3个维度；验证性因素分析显示，三因素模型对数据的拟合良好(χ 2/ df＝3.44，CFI＝0.91，TLI＝0.90，RMSEA＝0.05，SRMR＝0.05)；问卷的项目区分度良好，效标关联效度、聚合效度、区分效度、内部一致性信度(Cronbach α系数为0.92～0.96)和重测信度(间隔6个月的重测相关系数为0.63～0.68)均符合心理测量学要求。 结论:DAQ-CV可以作为测量和评估大学生替代性攻击倾向的工具。

abstractsObjective:To examine the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of displaced aggression questionnaire (DAQ-CV) among undergraduate students.Methods:A total of 1 876 undergraduate students were selected from six universities in China.The validity and reliability of the DAQ-CV was tested by SPSS 24.0 and Mplus 7.0 softwares.Particularly, item analysis, exploratory factor analysis ( n=564), confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis, internal consistency reliability testing and test-retest reliability testing ( n=875), and criterion-related validity testing, convergent validity testing and discriminant validity testing ( n=437) were administered. Results:Exploratory factor analysis showed that DAQ-CV included three dimensions: angry rumination, revenge planning and behavioral displaced aggression.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the three-factor model fitted the data well(χ 2/ df=3.44, CFI=0.91, TLI=0.90, RMSEA=0.05, SRMR=0.05). The discrimination indexes of the revised items, criterion-related validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency reliability(Cronbach α=0.92-0.96) and test-retest reliability ( the retest correlation coefficients of 6 months interval: 0.63-0.68) were met the psychological measurements requirements. Conclusion:DAQ-CV is a reliable and valid instrument which can be used as an effective tool to measure and evaluate the displaced aggression tendency of college students.