摘要Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a major disease burden. Wild?type p53?induced phosphatase 1 (Wip1) has been studied extensively in the context of cancer and the regulation of different types of stem cells, but the role of Wip1 in cardiac adaptation to MI is unknown. We investigated the significance of Wip1 in a mouse model of MI. Methods:The study began in June 2014 and was completed in July 2016.We compared Wip1?knockout (Wip1?KO) mice and wild?type (WT) mice to determine changes in cardiac function and survival in response to MI. The heart weight/body weight (HW/BW) ratio and cardiac function were measured before MI. Mouse MI was established by ligating the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery under 1.5%isoflurane anesthesia.After MI, survival of the mice was observed for 4 weeks. Cardiac function was examined by echocardiography. The HW/BW ratio was analyzed, and cardiac hypertrophy was measured by wheat germ agglutinin staining. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was used to determine the infarct size. Gene expression of interleukin?6 (IL?6), tumor necrosis factor?α (TNF-α), and interleukin?1β (IL-1β) was assessed by quantitative real?time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and the levels of signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 (stat3) and phosphor?stat3 (p?stat3) were also analyzed by Western blotting. Kaplan?Meier survival analysis, log?rank test, unpaired t?test, and one?way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for statistical analyses. Results: Wip1?KO mice had a marginally increased HW/BW ratio and slightly impaired cardiac function before LAD ligation. After MI, Wip1?deficient mice exhibited increased mortality (57.14% vs. 29.17%; n = 24 [WT], n = 35 [Wip1?KO], P < 0.05), increased cardiac hypertrophy (HW/BW ratio: 7 days: 7.25 ± 0.36 vs. 5.84 ± 0.18, n = 10, P < 0.01, and 4 weeks: 6.05 ± 0.17 vs. 5.87 ± 0.24, n = 10, P > 0.05;cross?sectional area: 7 days: 311.80 ± 8.29 vs. 268.90 ± 11.15, n = 6, P < 0.05, and 4 weeks: 308.80 ± 11.26 vs. 317.00 ± 13.55, n = 6, P > 0.05), and reduced cardiac function (ejection fraction: 7 days: 29.37 ± 1.38 vs. 34.72 ± 1.81, P < 0.05, and 4 weeks: 19.06 ± 2.07 vs. 26.37 ± 2.95, P < 0.05; fractional shortening: 7 days: 13.72 ± 0.71 vs. 16.50 ± 0.94, P < 0.05, and 4 weeks: 8.79 ± 1.00 vs. 12.48 ± 1.48, P < 0.05; n = 10 [WT], n = 15 [Wip1?KO]). H&E staining revealed a larger infarct size in Wip1?KO mice than in WT mice (34.79% ± 2.44% vs. 19.55% ± 1.48%, n = 6, P < 0.01). The expression of IL?6 and p?stat3 was downregulated in Wip1?KO mice (IL?6: 1.71 ± 0.27 vs. 4.46 ± 0.79, n = 6, P < 0.01; and p?stat3/stat3: 1.15 ± 0.15 vs. 1.97 ± 0.23, n = 6, P < 0.05). Conclusion: The results suggest that Wip1 could protect the heart from MI?induced ischemic injury.