自动乳腺容积超声成像与乳腺X线、常规手持超声检查患者接受度的对比分析研究
The research of contrast on acceptance of automated breast volume scanner,digital screening mammography and handheld ultrasound
摘要目的 本研究旨在分析对比患者在自动乳腺容积超声 (ABVS)、乳腺 X线与常规超声检查中的满意度和舒适度情况.方法 对528例进行 ABVS检查且既往行乳腺 X线和常规超声检查的女性进行问卷调查,回顾性分析受检者对 ABVS、常规超声与乳腺 X线检查的满意度和舒适度,以及受检者体质指数 (BMI)、罩杯大小、有无病灶及病灶大小对 ABVS、常规超声、乳腺 X线检查疼痛度的影响.结果 调查研究结果显示,乳腺 X线的疼痛评分高于 ABVS [4.0(2.0,6.0)对2.0 (1.0,4.0)],差异具有统计学意义 (P <0.05).92.4%的受检者愿意再次接受 ABVS检查,明显高于愿意再次行 X线检查者 (45.5%),且与愿意再次接受常规超声检查者比例相近 (94.7%).乳房罩杯大小、BMI、有无病灶及病灶大小均可影响患者对ABVS检查的疼痛感.结论 相比乳腺X线检查,患者对于ABVS检查的耐受性好,与常规超声无明显差异.
更多相关知识
abstractsObjective To compare patients'satisfaction and comfort associated with automated breast volume scanner(ABVS),handheld ultrasound(HHUS)and mammography(MMG).Methods Five hundred and twenty-eight women who performed ABVS examination and previously had undergone MMG and HHUS were enrolled.BMI,bra size,with or without lesion,lesion size,pain score of MMG,ABVS and HHUS were documented and analyzed.Results The pain score of MMG was significantly higher than that of ABVS[4.0(2.0,6.0)vs 2.0(1.0,4.0)](P <0.05).92.4% of the cases were preferred for the ABVS examination,which was higher than that for the MMG(45.5%),and was similar to HHUS(94.7%).Bra size,BMI,with or without lesion and lesion size could affect the pain degree of ABVS.Conclusions Routine use of ABVS will be well tolerated by patients than MMG.
More相关知识
- 浏览186
- 被引9
- 下载173

相似文献
- 中文期刊
- 外文期刊
- 学位论文
- 会议论文