• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

超声S-Detect分类技术在乳腺包块良恶性诊断中的应用价值

Application of S-Detect classification system in diagnosis of breast benign and malignant mass by ultrasound

摘要目的 探讨超声S-Detect分类技术在乳腺包块良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值.方法 选取我院2016年1-12月间经手术或病理穿刺活检证实的47例乳腺包块患者(共61个病灶).所有病灶分别进行二维超声成像BI-RADS分类(由3类不同年资乳腺专科超声医师进行判别)以及计算机S-Detect分类,分别计算人为BI-RADS分类及S-Detect分类对乳腺包块良恶性诊断的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值及阴性预测值.绘制各组的ROC曲线,比较ROC曲线下面积.结果 61个乳腺病灶中,病理证实良性病灶36个,恶性病灶25个.BI-RADS分类诊断的敏感性、特异性及准确性分别为:工作2年医师,69.4% 、72.0% 、70.5%;工作5年医师,64.0% 、92.0% 、75.4%;工作7年医师,69.4% 、92.0% 、78.7%.计算机S-Detect分类诊断敏感性、特异性及准确性分别为80.6% 、96.0% 、86.9%.S-Detect分类诊断特异性、准确性及阳性预测值均高于工作2年医师BI-RADS分类,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05).各组ROC曲线下面积分别为:工作2年医师,0.729;工作5年医师,0.786;工作7年医师,0.801;S-Detect分类,0.917.结论 与人工BI-RADS分类诊断相比,S-Detect分类在乳腺包块良恶性诊断中具有优势,尤其对于低年资医师,S-Detect分类有助于提高其诊断准确率.

更多

abstractsObjective To investigate the value of S-Detect classification in differential diagnosis of breast mass . Methods The data of forty-seven patients with breast mass lesions ( n=61) from our hospital during January to December in 2016 were retrospectively analyzed . Both the man-made BI-RADS classification ( identified by three different specialist physicians with 2 ,5 and 7 years of experience , respectively) and computer S-Detect classification were performed . The sensitivity ,specificity ,accuracy , positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the man-made BI-RADS classification and S-Detect classification of the benign or malignant diagnosis of breast lumps were calculated . The ROC curve was further plotted ,and the area under the curve ( AUC) of each group was compared ,respectively . Results Sixty-one breast mass lesions were confirmed 36 benign lesions and 25 malignant lesions by pathological biopsy . The sensitivity ,specificity and accuracy of man-made BI-RADS classification were as follows:2-year experience physicians 69 .4% ,72 .0% and 70 .5% ;5-year experience physicians:64 .0% ,92 .0% and 75 .4% ;7-year experience physicians:69 .4% , 92 .0% and 78 .7% . The diagnostic sensitivity , specificity , and accuracy of S-Detect classification were 80 .6% ,96 .0% and 86 .9% . The specificity ,accuracy and positive predictive value of S-Detect classification were significantly higher than those of 2-year experience physicians by BI-RADS classification ( P <0 .05) . The area under the ROC curve of each group was 0 .729 ,0 .786 and 0 .801 for 2 , 5 and 7-year experience physicians , respectively , and 0 .917 for S-Detect classification . Conclusions Compared with the man-made BI-RADS classification ,S-Detect classification has advantages in diagnosis of the benign or malignant of breast mass and is helpful to improve the accuracy of diagnosis , especially for junior physicians .

More
广告
  • 浏览439
  • 下载226
中华超声影像学杂志

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷