医学文献 >>
  • 检索发现
  • 增强检索
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
默认
×
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

儿童心理行为发育问题预警征象筛查表的信度效度评估

Reliability and validity of warning signs checklist for screening psychological, behavioral and developmental problems of children

摘要目的 对国家卫生和计划生育委员会组织研发的"儿童心理行为发育问题预警征象"(简称"预警征")筛查表开展信度和效度评估,验证预警征筛查表对儿童心理行为发育问题早期筛查的实效性.方法 采取分层随机抽样方法,从全国11个省市抽取低危人群1 513名,高危人群597名,累计2 110名0~6岁儿童进行国家卫生和计划生育委员会组织研发的预警征的信度和效度评估.其中信度评估包括重测信度、测试者间信度评估.以年龄与发育进程问卷(ASQ)和盖瑟尔发育量表(GESELL)为校标量表,通过检验预警征与效标量表测定结果的相关性和一致性,评估校标效度.结果不同年龄点预警征筛查阳性率为10.8%(21/141)~26.2%(51/137),每例研究对象筛查所需时间中位数为1 min(四分位间距0.6 min).重测信度及测试者信度的相关系数均达到0.7及以上,表明预警征筛查结果的稳定性较好.在效度评估上,预警征与ASQ测评结果高度一致,一致性Kappa值为0.63.以GESELL为效标,预警征筛查发现可疑发育偏异儿童的灵敏度为82.2%,特异度为77.7%,总体Youden指数为0.6.结论 预警征筛查的信度和效度已达到了心理学筛查量表评估的基本要求,并且筛查花费时间少、内容简洁,可用于广大基层开展儿童早期心理行为发育偏异的早期筛查工作.

更多

abstractsObjective To evaluate the reliability and validity of warning signs checklist developed by the National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People′s Republic of China (NHFPC),so as to determine the screening effectiveness of warning signs on developmental problems of early childhood.Method Stratified random sampling method was used to assess the reliability and validity of checklist of warning sign and 2 110 children 0 to 6 years of age(1 513 low-risk subjects and 597 high-risk subjects) were recruited from 11 provinces of China.The reliability evaluation for the warning signs included the test-retest reliability and interrater reliability.With the use of Age and Stage Questionnaire (ASQ) and Gesell Development Diagnosis Scale (GESELL) as the criterion scales,criterion validity was assessed by determining the correlation and consistency between the screening results of warning signs and the criterion scales.Result In terms of the warning signs,the screening positive rates at different ages ranged from 10.8%(21/141) to 26.2%(51/137).The median (interquartile) testing time for each subject was 1(0.6) minute.Both the test-retest reliability and interrater reliability of warning signs reached 0.7 or above,indicating that the stability was good.In terms of validity assessment,there was remarkable consistency between ASQ and warning signs,with the Kappa value of 0.63.With the use of GESELL as criterion,it was determined that the sensitivity of warning signs in children with suspected developmental delay was 82.2%,and the specificity was 77.7%.The overall Youden index was 0.6.Conclusion The reliability and validity of warning signs checklist for screening early childhood developmental problems have met the basic requirements of psychological screening scales,with the characteristics of short testing time and easy operation.Thus,this warning signs checklist can be used for screening psychological and behavioral problems of early childhood,especially in community settings.

More
广告
  • 浏览1656
  • 下载1009
中华儿科杂志

中华儿科杂志

2017年55卷6期

445-450页

MEDLINEISTICPKUCSCDCA

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

法律状态公告日 法律状态 法律状态信息

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new医文AI 翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷