• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

有无均整器模式下鼻咽癌容积旋转调强放疗计划的剂量学比较

Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans for nasopharyngeal carcinoma using flattening filter-free and flattening filter modes

摘要目的 比较加速器6MVX射线非均整模式(FFF)和均整模式(FF)下局部进展期鼻咽癌容积调强(VMAT)计划的剂量学差异.方法 选取10例已行放疗的局部进展期鼻咽癌患者,分别设计FFF和FF VMAT计划,在满足临床要求的情况下,比较两种计划的剂量体积直方图(DVH)、靶区剂量分布、危及器官受量、靶区适形度、总机器跳数和治疗时间.结果 两者均能满足临床治疗需求,FFF VMAT计划靶区最大剂量和平均剂量大于FF VMAT计划(t=-0.31、-0.35,P <0.05),而计划靶区适形度略低(t=5.42,P<0.05),左右晶状体的最大剂量低于FF VMAT计划(t=25.87、17.45,P<0.05),其他危及器官剂量无明显差异.机器总跳数FFF VMAT为(699±16) MU,FFVMAT为(628±12)MU.平均单次治疗时间均约2 min,两者无明显差别.结论 两种计划均能满足临床治疗需求,FFF VMAT计划更利于保护照射野边缘危及器官,如晶状体.机器总跳数FFFVMAT计划高于FF VMAT计划但两者平均单次治疗时间无明显差别.

更多

abstractsObjective To compare the dosimetric difference of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for the loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients using 6 MV X-ray flattening filter-free (FFF) and flattening filter (FF) modes.Methods Ten previously treated patients with loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma were retrospectively included and replanned using FFF and FF VMAT,respectively.Meeting all clinical criteria,the dose-volume histograms (DVH),dose distribution of target volume and organs at risk (OARs),target conformity index (CI),total monitor unites (MUs) and treatment time were compared across the plans.Results VMAT plans suing either FFF and FF modes can meet the clinical objectives.The maximum and mean target dose of FFF VMAT plans were significantly higher than that of FF VMAT plans (t =-0.31,-O.35,P < O.05).Yet the planning target volume (PTV) CI of FF mode was slightly better than of FFF mode (t =5.42,P <0.05).The maximum doses of lenses in FFF VMAT plans were lower than that of FF VMAT plans (t =25.87,17.45,P < 0.05),and other OARs displayed no significant difference.The mean total MUs of FFF and FF VMAT plans were (699 ± 16) and (628 ± 12) MUs respectively.The mean treatment time of two modes were consistent (about 2 min).Conclusions The plan qualities of FFF and FF VMAT plans were comparable and both clinically acceptable.The OARs at the edge of radiation field,such as lens,could be spared better using FFF VMAT mode.The total MUs of FFF VMAT plans were higher than FF VMAT plans,yet were delivered within the same time.

More
广告
  • 浏览513
  • 下载132
中华放射医学与防护杂志

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷