摘要目的:评估基于Halcyon 3.0直线加速器不同子野调制参数的应用对海马保护全脑放疗(HA-WBRT)计划的剂量学影响。方法:选取13例上海中医药大学附属曙光医院放疗科使用Halcyon 3.0直线加速器行全脑放射治疗患者，根据射束形状控制器(ASC)调制能力差异划分6组HA-WBRT计划类型：ASC关闭组(AO)、ASC极低组(AVL)、ASC较低组(AL)、ASC中位组(AM)、ASC较高组(AH)及ASC极高组(AVH)。统计评估不同子野调制参数对于靶区适形性(CI)、均匀性(HI)、海马区等危及器官受照剂量和计划执行效率的影响，并使用ArcCHECK和Portal Dosimetry两种剂量验证工具综合分析不同子野调制参数计划中射束剂量沉积精准性的差异。结果:6组计划均能满足临床治疗要求。6组间靶区的CI和HI值相近，差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。危及器官的受照剂量方面，AVH组对于危及器官的保护效果更好。其中AVL组中脑干 Dmax低于AO组，但视交叉 Dmax高于AO组( F＝6.26、8.04， P<0.05)；AH组中眼球 Dmax小于AO组，但视神经 Dmax高于AO组( F＝2.04、1.37， P<0.05)；AVH组中脑干、眼球和眼晶状体的 Dmax均小于AO组( F＝6.26、2.04、2.02， P<0.05)。其他危及器官剂量学指标差异均无统计学意义( P > 0.05)。6组计划中ArcCHECK验证及Portal Dosimetry验证的γ通过率在2%/2 mm模式分析结果均>98%，3%/3 mm模型分析结果均为100%。ArcCHECK的γ通过率相较于Portal Dosimetry整体偏低。6组间计划跳数最大差异< 15，不同子野调制参数计划的执行效率无显著区别。 结论:基于Halcyon 3.0直线加速器能够完成符合临床治疗标准的HA-WBRT计划，不同子野调制参数对于计划的剂量学参数优化明显，其中AVH参数能够更好地减少危及器官的受照剂量；且不同子野调制参数对剂量沉积精准性及执行效率的影响均不显著，都符合临床治疗剂量验证标准。

abstractsObjective:To evaluate the dosimetric effects of different aperture shape controller (ASC) parameters based on the Halcyon 3.0 accelerator in the hippocampal avoidance-whole brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) plans.Methods:This study enrolled 13 patients treated with WBRT using a Halcyon 3.0 accelerator at the Department of Radiotherapy of the Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. According to different aperture shape controller (ASC) parameters, the HA-WBRT plans were divided into six groups, namely non, very low, low, moderate, high, and very high ASC settings, marked by AO, AVL, AL, AM, AH, and AVH, respectively. This study presented a statistical evaluation of the effects of different ASC parameters on conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), radiation doses to the hippocampus and other organs at risk, and the plans’ execution efficiency. Furthermore, using two dose verification tools, namely ArcCHECK and Portal Dosimetry, this study delivered a comprehensive analysis of the differences in beam delivery precision of the plans with different ASC parameters.Results:The six groups all met the requirements for clinical treatment. They had similar CI and HI values, with no statistically significant differences ( P > 0.05). The AVH group showed better protection effects on organs at risk. Compared to the control group, the AVL group showed lower Dmax of brainstems but higher Dmax of chiasma opticum ( F = 6.26, 8.04, P < 0.05). Compared to the control group, the AH group showed lower Dmax of eyeballs but higher Dmax of optic nerves ( F = 2.04, 1.37, P < 0.05). In contrast, the AVH group exhibited lower Dmax of brainstems, eyeballs, and lens than the control group ( F = 6.26, 2.04, 2.02, P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed in dosimetric indices of other organs at risk ( P > 0.05). As verified using ArcCHECK and Portal Dosimetry, the γ passing rates of the six groups were over 98% at 2%/2 mm and 100% at 3%/3 mm. The overall γ passing rates verified using ArcCHECK were lower than those verified using Portal Dosimetry. The maximum difference in the monitor unit among the six groups was less than 15, and these groups did not show significant differences in terms of execution efficiency. Conclusions:The HA-WBRT plans based on the Halcyon 3.0 accelerator can meet the requirements for clinical treatment. Different ASC parameters can significantly optimize the dosimetric parameters. Among them, the AVH parameters can highly reduce the radiation dose to organs at risk. Furthermore, different ASC parameters show insignificant effects on beam delivery precision and plan execution efficiency, meeting the verification standards for clinical therapeutic doses.