• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

矫形棒刚度与置钉密度对Lenke 1型特发性脊柱侧凸矫正率的影响

Effect of rod stiffness and screw density on correction rate of Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

摘要目的 探讨矫形棒刚度与置钉密度对Lenke 1型特发性脊柱侧凸矫正率的影响.方法 2008年7月至2012年7月应用后路椎弓根钉技术进行矫形的资料完整的Lenke 1型特发性脊柱侧凸患者48例,男10例,女38例;年龄12~21岁,平均(15.65±3.21)岁.于术前及术后1周脊柱全长正侧位X线片上测量冠状面主弯Cobb角、矢状面后凸Cobb角(T5-T12)、融合节段数与置钉总数.将病例分为四组:低刚度矫形棒+低置钉密度组13例,低刚度矫形棒+高置钉密度组10例,高刚度矫形棒+高置钉密度组14例,高刚度矫形棒+低置钉密度组11例.比较各组冠状面矫正率与矢状面胸后凸矫正率的差异.结果 低刚度矫形棒+低置钉密度组冠状面矫正率为79.78%±6.89%,矢状面胸后凸矫正率为-53.02%±12.37%;低刚度矫形棒+高置钉密度组分别为80.09%±6.28%,-3.76%±41.58%;高刚度矫形棒+高置钉密度组分别为84.48%±8.06%,46.25%±49.81%;高刚度矫形棒+低置钉密度组分别为79.35%±6.80%,-8.63%±42.69%.四组冠状面矫正率的差异无统计学意义;四组矢状面矫正率除低刚度矫形棒+高置钉密度组与高刚度矫形棒+低置钉密度组外,其他组间差异均有统计学意义.结论 矫形棒刚度与置钉密度对Lenke 1型特发性脊柱侧凸矫正率的影响主要体现在矢状面上,对冠状面矫正率无明显影响;高刚度矫形棒与高置钉密度能显著提高矢状面矫正率.

更多

abstractsObjective To investigate the effect of rod stiffness and screw density on correction rate in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).Methods A total of 48 patients with Lenke type 1 AIS,who had undergone surgical correction with pedicle screws from July 2008 to July 2012,were analyzed in this study.There were 10 males and 38 females,aged from 12 to 21 years (average,15.65±3.21 years).The standing anteroposterior and lateral X-rays of whole spine were obtained before surgery and at 1 week after surgery.The following parameters were measured:1) coronal Cobb angle of the major curve; 2) sagittal Cobb angle (T5-T12); 3) number of fusion segments and screws instrumented vertebrae.All cases were divided into 4 groups:low stiffness rod with low screw density (number of screws per fusion segment/2<0.60) group (13 cases); low stiffness rod with high screw density (number of screws per fusion segment/2>0.60) group (10 cases); high stiffness rod with high screw density group (14 cases); high stiffness rod with low screw density group (11 cases).The coronal and sagittal correction rates were compared among 4 groups.Results The correction rate of coronal and sagittal Cobb angle was respectively 79.78%±6.89% and-53.02%±12.37% in low stiffness rod with low screw density group,80.09%±6.28% and-3.76%±41.58% in low stiffness rod with high screw density group,84.48%±8.06% and 46.25%±49.81% in high stiffness rod with high screw density group,and 79.35%±6.80% and-8.63%±42.69% in high stiffness rod with low screw density group.There was no significantly statistical difference in coronal correction rate between four groups (F=1.533,P=0.219).The difference in sagittal correction rate was not significant between low stiffness rod with high screw density group and high stiffness rod with low screw density group (-3.76%±41.58% and-8.63%±42.69%,P=0.654),but significant among other groups.Conclusion For Lenke type 1 AIS patients,rod stiffness and screw density mainly influence the sagittal correction rate rather than coronal correction rate.High stiffness rod and high screw density could significantly increase the sagittal plane correction rate.

More
广告
  • 浏览706
  • 下载152
中华骨科杂志

中华骨科杂志

2013年33卷12期

1169-1175页

ISTICPKUCSCDCA

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷