医学文献 >>
  • 检索发现
  • 增强检索
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
默认
×
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

中国6省市急性乙型病毒性肝炎住院病例诊断与报告一致性分析

Consistency analysis on acute hepatitis B inpatients reported by hepatitis B surveillance pilot spots in six provinces of China

摘要目的 了解乙型病毒性肝炎(乙肝)监测点报告的急性乙肝住院病例的基本特征,分析报告的急性乙肝病例与临床医生诊断的一致性.方法 从全国法定传染病报告系统(NNDRS)中获得急性乙肝病例信息,通过查询医院信息系统(Hospital Information System)了解急性乙肝的基本情况,记录本次就诊住院的临床诊断,分析临床医生的急性乙肝诊断与NNDRS中的报告类型相一致的比例.结果 本次研究对象共179例,均为2015-2016年NNDRS中报告的急性乙肝病例,其中HBsAg阳性时间6个月由阴性转为阳性者占2.79%(5/179),HBsAg阳性持续时间≥6个月者占32.40%(58/179),本次为第一次检测HBsAg或时间不详的占64.80%(116/179);有乙肝病史的占33.52%(60/179),有甲、丙肝病史的占1.12%(2/179),无肝炎病史的占41.34%(74/179),肝炎病史不详的占24.02%(43/179);有肝炎症状和体征的占79.89%(143/179),无肝炎症状和体征的占20.11%(36/179).179例NNDRS报告的急性乙肝病例中,临床医生诊断为急性乙肝67例,非急性乙肝112例,急性乙肝一致率为37.43%(67/179).不一致的病例共计112例,以诊断为慢性乙肝(49.11%,55/112)和乙肝后肝硬化(16.07%,18/112)为主.结论 NNDRS中报告的急性乙肝住院病例报告类型与临床医生的急性乙肝诊断类型一致性较差.临床医生在保证诊断准确性的前提下,应按照临床诊断分类进行网络报告,使NNDRS中乙肝的分类类型与临床医生的分类诊断相一致.

更多

abstractsObjective To understand the characteristics of acute hepatitis B inpatients reported by the hepatitis B surveillance pilot points and to estimate the consistency between the diagnosed and reported types of hepatitis B by the clinicians involved.Methods Data related to acute hepatitis B was from the NNDRS and the characteristics of acute hepatitis B were classified by querying Hospital Information System.We recorded the results based on clinical diagnosis and analyzed the consistency between the reported and diagnosed types that the clinicians made,on hepatitis B.Resulis A total of 179 patients were included in this study with all of them as acute hepatitis B reported through NNDRS in 2015-2016.In terms of the durations of disease,among the 179 cases who were HBsAg positive,32.40% (58/179) of them exceeding 6 months,2.79% (5/179) within 6 months and 64.80% (116/179) tested the first time or never.Among the 179 cases who claimed having the history of hepatitis,33.52% (60/179) of them identified as having hepatitis B,1.12% (2/179) were hepatitis A,C or E,41.34% (74/179) did not have the signs on hepatitis,while the rest 24.02% (43/179) did not know the situation.Only 79.89%(143/179) of the patients showed the symptoms or signs of hepatitis,but the rest 20.11%(36/179) did not.Among the 179 reported acute hepatitis patients,67 of them were diagnosed as acute hepatitis B while 112 cases were as non-acute hepatitis B.The consistent rate of acute hepatitis B was 37.43% (67/179).Among the 112 cases that were diagnosed as non-acute hepatitis B,proportions of chronic hepatitis B and cirrhosis were 49.11%(55/112) and 16.07%(18/112) respectively.Conclusion Consistency between the reported type of acute hepatitis B inpatients and the types diagnosed by clinicians was poor.Our results suggested that clinicians should make the accurate diagnosis at first place and then report to the Network in accordance with the clinical diagnosis classification criterfia,set by the government.

More
广告
  • 浏览283
  • 下载163
中华流行病学杂志

中华流行病学杂志

2017年38卷2期

216-220页

MEDLINEISTICPKUCSCDCA

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷