• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

输尿管下段结石体外冲击波碎石术后坦索罗辛和索利那新辅助排石的疗效比较

Combination solifenacin and tamsulosin for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

摘要目的 比较坦索罗辛和索利那新对输尿管下段结石ESWL后辅助排石和缓解疼痛的疗效. 方法 2009年11月至2011年5月收治的输尿管下段结石患者120例,男100例,女20例.年龄18 ~ 67岁.随机分为4组,每组30例.结石直径0.5~1.1 cm.所有患者采用X线定位下ESW L治疗后,对照组不采取任何辅助排石措施;索利那新组口服索利那新5 mg,1次/d;坦索罗辛组口服坦索罗辛0.2 mg,1次/d;坦索罗辛联合索利那新组口服索利那新5 mg,1次/d、坦索罗辛0.2 mg,1次/d.所有患者治疗观察期2周. 结果 2周后跟据KUB检查结果评估各组结石排净率,对照组为80.0% (24/30),索利那新组为83.3%( 26/30),坦索岁辛组为93.3% (28/30),联合治疗组96.7% (29/30).坦索罗辛组与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).联合治疗组与其余3组相比,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).对照组、索利那新组、坦索罗辛组、联合治疗组排石时间分别为(7.6±3.7)、(6.3±2.5)、(4.4±2.3)、(3.5±2.2)d,联合治疗组、坦索罗辛组与对照组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).对照组、索利那新组、坦索罗辛组、联合组使用镇痛药物患者分别为13、5、9、3例,发生膀胱刺激征患者分别为12、6、10、4例,各组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05). 结论 在输尿管下段结石行ESWL后,使用坦索罗辛和索利那新辅助排石安全、有效,能缩短排石时间、缓解疼痛、改善膀胱刺激症状,坦索罗辛和索利那新联合应用疗效更好.

更多

abstractsObjective To evaluate the efficacy of combination solifenacin and tamsulosin for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Methods 120 patients (male:100 female:20 age:18-67 yrs) randomly assigned to 4 groups (each group 30) with the calculi diameter range from 0.5 to 1.1 cm.All patients performed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (X ray oriented).The control group did not accept any medical treatment.The solifenacin group were administered solifenacin 5 mg,once per day.The tamsulosin group were administered tamsulosin 0.2 mg,once per day.The combination group were administered solifenacin 5mg,plus tamsulosin 0.2 mg,each per day.The observation duration was set at 2 weeks. Results The stone-free rate (according to KUB) within 2 weeks were 80.0%,83.3%,93.3% and 96.7% in the control group,solifenacin group,tamsulosin group and combination group respectively.Statistical differences were significant among the tamsulosin group,the combination group and the control group.The stone expulsion times were (7.6 + 3.7) d,(6.3 ± 2.5) d,(4.4 + 2.3) d and (3.5 ± 2.2) d in the 4 groups respectively.Statistical differences were significant among the tamsulosin group,the combination group and the control group.The uses of analgesics were 13,5,9 and 3 in the 4 groups respectively.The bladder irrtative symptoms were 12,6,4 and 4 in the 4 groups respectively.Statistical differences were also significant for the use of analgesics and relief of bladder irritation between the solifenacin group,the combination group and the control group. Conclusions Tamsulosin and solifenacin could be safe and effective for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.It could significantly improve the stone expulsion rate,relief the pain and improve bladder irrtative symptoms.

More
广告
  • 浏览532
  • 下载196
中华泌尿外科杂志

中华泌尿外科杂志

2012年33卷7期

532-535页

ISTICPKUCSCDCA

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷