• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

神经刺激器与超声引导连续股神经阻滞用于患者膝关节术后镇痛临床价值的比较

Clinical value of nerve stimulator-versus ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve block for analgesia after laparoscopic surgery

摘要目的 比较神经刺激器与超声引导连续股神经阻滞用于患者膝关节术后镇痛的临床价值.方法 择期行膝关节镜手术患者40例,年龄18~60岁,体重指数18 ~ 30 kg/m2,性别不限,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,采用随机数字表法,将其分为2组(n=20):神经刺激器组(S组)和超声组(U组).2组均行连续硬膜外麻醉,用药为1.73%碳酸利多卡因.2组术后持续输注0.2%罗哌卡因5ml/h行股神经阻滞进行镇痛.分别于术后2、6、24和48 h时行静态VAS评分,于术后24和48 h时行主动运动及被动运动VSA评分,记录股神经旁置管时间、穿刺点皮下血肿及局麻药中毒、恶心和呕吐等发生情况,记录术后补救镇痛情况.结果 2组术后VAS评分、股神经阻滞穿刺和局麻药的相关不良事件发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).S组和U组股神经旁置管时间分别为8.0± 1.4和(6.7±0.9)min,S组长于U组(P<0.01).2组术后均未进行补救镇痛.结论 神经刺激器引导连续股神经阻滞用于患者膝关节术后镇痛的临床价值高于超声引导,更适合临床推广应用.

更多

abstractsObjective To compare the clinical value of nerve stimulator-versus ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve block for analgesia after laparoscopic surgery.Methods Forty patients,aged 18-60 yr,with body mass index of 18-30 kg/m2,of ASA physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ,scheduled for elective laparoscopic surgery,were randomly assigned into 2 groups (n =20 each) using a random number table:nerve stimulator group (group S) and ultrasound group (group U).Epidural anesthesia was performed with 1.73 % carbonated lidocaine in both groups.0.2% ropivacaine 5 ml/h was infused continuously after surgery to perform femoral nerve block for analgesia.VAS score at rest was assessed at 2,6,24 and 48 h after surgery.At 24 and 48 h after surgery,VAS scores during active and passive movement were assessed.The time for catheter placement near the femoral nerve and development of subcutaneous hematoma at the puncture site,local anesthetic intoxication and nausea and vomiting were recorded.The postoperative requirement for analgesics was also recorded.Results There was no significant difference in the VAS scores and puncture for femoral nerve block-and local anesthetics-related adverse events between the two groups.The time for catheter placement near the femoral nerve was 8.0 ± 1.4 and (6.7 ± 0.9) min in S and U groups,respectively,and the time was significantly longer in group S than in group U.No patients required rescue analgesic after surgery in both groups.Conclusion Nerve stimulator-guided continuous femoral nerve block provides higher clinical value than ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve block for analgesia after laparoscopic surgery and it is more suitable for clinical application.

More
广告
  • 浏览297
  • 下载320
中华麻醉学杂志

中华麻醉学杂志

2014年34卷10期

1204-1206页

ISTICPKUCSCDCA

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷