腹腔镜胆囊切除胆道探查取石术与内镜下Oddi括约肌切开取石联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疗效比较
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus exploration of the common bile duct in comparison with laparoscopiccholecystectomyandendoscopicsphincterotomyforsecondary choledocholithiasis
摘要目的 比较腹腔镜胆囊切除(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)胆道探查取石(laparoscopic common bile duct exploration,LCBDE)与内镜下Oddi括约肌切开(endoscopic sphincterotomy,EST)取石联合LC两种方法治疗继发性胆总管结石的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2008年1月至2009年12月我院收治的采用LC+ LCBDE或EST+ LC治疗的继发性胆总管结石患者的临床资料,对比两种方法的手术成功率、手术时间、术后并发症、残石率、住院时间、住院费用等。统计学处理,计数资料用X2检验,计量资料采用独立样本t检验。结果 共收治继发性胆总管结石患者163例,有87例行LC+ LCBDE,76例行EST +LC。二者相比,LC+ LCBDE手术时间较EST+ LC平均缩短30 min、住院时间缩短3d、术后并发症少、费用低,二者手术成功率、残石率无显著差异。结论 治疗继发性胆总管结石,LC+ LCBDE安全、有效,并发症少,在病情允许情况下,可作为首选方法。
更多相关知识
abstractsObjective To compare the effects between laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) +laparoscopic common bile duct exploration(LCBDE) and endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST) + laparoscopic cholecystectomy( LC ) for secondary choledocholithiasis.Methods The clinical data of patients with secondary choledocholithiasis receiving LC + LCBDE or EST + LC from January 2008 to December 2009 were retrospectively compared. Parameters included operation time, postoperative complication, length of stay,cost of hospitalization. All patients received follow up of 1 year. Enumeration data was analyzed by chisquare test and measurement data was analyzed by t test. Results In this study 87 patients received LC +LCBDE,76 patients received EST + LC. Patients in LC + LCBDE group had shorter hospital stay, less hospital charges and less complications. There was not difference in the procedure success rate and stone remanent rate between the two groups.Conclusions LC + LCBDE could be used as the first choice for patients with gallstones and secondary choledocholithiasis.
More相关知识
- 浏览518
- 被引30
- 下载136

相似文献
- 中文期刊
- 外文期刊
- 学位论文
- 会议论文


换一批



