医学文献 >>
  • 检索发现
  • 增强检索
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
默认
×
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

2型糖尿病患者频繁静脉取血法动态血糖监测的准确性评估

Accuracy assessment of continuous glucose monitoring by frequent venous blood collection in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

摘要目的 应用频繁静脉取血法在2型糖尿病患者中对回顾性动态血糖监测系统(CGMS)的点准确度及趋势准确度进行评价.方法 2010年8月至10月共纳入11例2型糖尿病患者,应用美敦力公司GOLDTM (GMS)连续监测3d血糖,同时每天输入4次指尖血糖值进行校正.受试者在CGMS监测的3 d内随机选择1d参加连续7h的频繁静脉取血(15 min取1次),并用美国YSI STAT PlusTM葡萄糖乳酸分析仪(YSI值)进行血浆葡萄糖值的测定.应用多种统计方法和统计量来综合进行准确性评估,包括CGMS值和匹配的YSI值相比在20%和30%偏差范围内的一致率、误差栅格分析、绝对差值的相对数(ARD)、Bland-Altman分析以及趋势分析等.两变量相关分析采用Pearson相关分析.结果 11例患者共收集到319对YSI-CGMS配对数据值;与YSI值相比,88.4% (95% CI:0.84~0.92)的CGMS值在20%偏差范围内,96.9%的CGMS值在30%偏差范围内.Clarke误差栅格分析显示YSI-CGMS配对数据值进入A区和B区的比例分别为88%、12%,共识误差栅格分析显示进入A区和B区的比例分别为96.2%、3.8%.连续误差栅格分析显示YSI-CGMS配对数据值在准确数据区、良性错误区及错误数据区分别为94.4%、2.8%及2.8%.ARD的均值为10.5%,中位数为8.4%,Bland-Altman分析均值为0.47 mmol/L(95% CI:- 1.90 ~3.01).趋势分析显示82.5%的两者变化率差异集中在0.06 mmol·L-1·min -1的变化范围内,只有1.7%的数据对绝对差异超过0.17 mmol·L-1·min-1.结论 无论对点时血糖还是对血糖变化趋势的反映,CGMS均有较好的准确性;但对低血糖事件进行评判时,尚需结合临床实际情况具体分析.

更多

abstractsObjective To assess the accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in type 2 diabetic patients by frequent venous blood collection.Methods A total of 11 patients with type 2 diabetes treated from August to October 2010 were enrolled in this study.The Medtronic GOLDTM CGMS was used to monitor the continuous changes of the blood glucose levels for 3 successive days in all subjects,meanwhile the fingertip blood glucose was tested at least 4 times each day for calibration.The venous blood of the subjects was randomly collected every 15 min per hour for 7 successive hours on one day when the subjects wore the sensor,and was tested using the YSI 2300 STAT PlusTM glucose&lactate analyzer.The accuracy was comprehensively evaluated by using statistical methods including the rate of agreement between the sensor readings and the paired YSI values within ± 20% and ± 30% of deviations,the error grid analysis,absolute relative difference (ARD), Bland-Altman analysis and trend analysis. Correlation analysis of two variables was done with Pearson correlation analysis. Results A total of 319 paired YSI-sensor values were collected from the 11 patients.Total 88.4% of the sensor readings (95% CI:0.84-0.92) were within ±20% of the YSI values,and 96.9% within ±30% of the YSI values.Clarke error grid analyses showed that the ratios of the YSI-sensor values in region A to region B were 88% and 12% ;Consensus error grid analyses showed that the ratios of the YSI-sensor values in region A to region B were 96.2% and 3.8% ; Continuous error grid analyses showed that the ratios of the YSI-sensor values in region of accurate reading,benign errors,erroneous reading were 94.4%,2.8%,2.8%,respectively.The mean ARD for all subjects was 10.5% and the median ARD was 8.4%. The Bland-Altman analysis detected the mean blood glucose level of 0.47 mmol/L (95% CI:- 1.90-3.01 mmol/L).Trend analysis revealed that 82.5% of the difference of the rates of change between the YSI values and sensor readings occurred within the range of 0.06 mmol · L-1 · min -1,and only 1.7% of the absolute differences of the paired values were more than 0.17 mmol · L-1 · min-1.Conclusions The CGMS has high accuracy both in monitoring the blood glucose at a specific time and reflecting the trend of changes of the blood glucose level. However,actual clinical manifestations should be taken into account for diagnosis of hypoglycemia.

More
广告
  • 浏览407
  • 下载238
中华糖尿病杂志

中华糖尿病杂志

2012年04卷9期

523-528页

ISTICPKUCSCDCA

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

法律状态公告日 法律状态 法律状态信息

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new医文AI 翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷