医学文献 >>
  • 检索发现
  • 增强检索
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
默认
×
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

对侧控制型功能性电刺激对亚急性期脑卒中患者上肢运动功能恢复的影响

Contralateral controlled functional electrical stimulation improves the recovery of upper limb motor function after a stroke

摘要目的:观察对侧控制型功能性电刺激(CCFES)常规治疗及强化治疗对亚急性脑卒中患者上肢运动功能恢复的影响。方法:选取病程1~3个月的脑卒中患者43例,按照随机数字表法将其分为CCFES组(14例)、CCFES强化组(14例)和神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)组(15例)。3组患者均接受常规康复训练,CCFES组给予CCFES常规剂量治疗,CCFES强化组给予CCFES强化剂量治疗,NMES组给予NMES常规剂量治疗。3组均给予每次20 min相应电刺激治疗,CCFES强化组每日给予2次,余两组每日1次,每周5 d,连续3周。分别于治疗前、治疗3周后(治疗后),采用上肢Fugl-Meyer评分法、改良Barthel指数、表面肌电图(sEMG)以及腕关节背伸主动关节活动度对患者进行上肢功能评估。结果:治疗前,3组患者上肢FMA、MBI、RMS比值、关节活动度比较,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。与组内治疗前比较,3组患者治疗后上述指标均有所改善( P<0.05)。与NMES组治疗后比较,CCFES组和强化CCFES组各项评估指标均较为优异( P<0.05)。与CCFES组比较,强化CCFES组治疗后RMS比值(0.22±0.05)、关节活动度[(22.79±6.74)°]较为优异。 结论:CCFES及CCFES强化训练较NMES在促进患者上肢功能恢复方面均有显著优势,CCFES强化训练在改善患侧肢体肌力及关节活动度方面较为优异。

更多

abstractsObjective:To observe the effect of contralateral controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) on the recovery of upper limb motor function after a stroke.Methods:Stroke survivors 1 to 6 months after onset were randomly divided into a CCFES group (14 cases, group A), a CCFES intensive group (14 cases, group B) and a neuromuscular electrical stimulation group (15 cases , group C). In addition to routine rehabilitation training, groups A and B received contralateral controlled functional electrical stimulation, while Group C received routine neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Group B was treated twice daily, while the other two groups were given 1 session each day, 5 times a week for 3 weeks. Each session lasted 20 minutes. The Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), the Modified Barthel Index (MBI), surface electromyography and the active range of motion for wrist dorsiflexion were used to evaluate the subjects′ upper limb function before and after the treatment.Results:There was no significant difference in any of the measurements among the three groups before the treatment. After the treatment, all of them had improved significantly, with the improvements in groups A and B significantly greater than in group C, on average.Conclusions:Both normal and intensive contralateral controlled functional electrical stimulation have significant advantages over neuromuscular electrical stimulation in promoting functional recovery of the upper limbs. Intensive CCFES training is superior to routine training in improving muscle strength and range of motion.

More
广告
  • 浏览122
  • 下载100
中华物理医学与康复杂志

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

法律状态公告日 法律状态 法律状态信息

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new医文AI 翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷