• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

高亲和力人源化CD19 CAR-T细胞对Raji细胞株体外、体内杀伤活性研究

In vitro and in vivo cytotoxic activity of humanized CD19 CAR-T cells against Raji cell line

摘要目的 通过体内、外试验比较人源化及鼠源化CD19 CAR-T细胞对Raji细胞株的不同杀伤活性.方法 收集8例拟行CD19 CAR-T治疗的淋巴瘤患者外周血,作为外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)、鼠源与人源化CD19 CAR-T细胞培养的T细胞来源.CCK-8法检测细胞增殖、LDH法检测细胞杀伤活性;BALB/c雌性裸鼠Raji荧光细胞株成瘤,活体成像技术观察裸鼠体内瘤体变化;流式细胞术检测细胞转染率及裸鼠体内CAR-T细胞比例.结果 两组CAR-T细胞转染率差异无统计学意义,其增殖活性于培养24 h人源化组细胞高于鼠源组,差异无统计学意义(P=0.104),48 h人源化CAR-T细胞增殖活性明显高于鼠源组(P=0.009).杀伤活性检测,设定不同效靶比(1:1,4:1),作用24 h两种CAR-T对靶细胞的杀伤活性差异无统计学意义(P=0.102和P=0.095);48 h时不同效靶比人源化CD19 CAR-T细胞的杀伤活性高于鼠源组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.005和P=0.008),其杀伤活性均高于PBMC对照组.尾静脉注射细胞治疗Raji荷瘤裸鼠后14 d,鼠源和人源化CAR-T组裸鼠体内瘤体均缩小,对照组裸鼠瘤体增大,治疗21 d,鼠源组开始出现瘤体增大,而人源化组无明显变化.鼠源组裸鼠于25 d全部死亡,而人源化组裸鼠于31 d开始死亡.裸鼠体内CD19 CAR-T细胞检测示两组裸鼠均于输注后7 d达峰值,然人源化组细胞高于鼠源组(P4 d=0.001,P7 d=0.000,P14 d=0.003),鼠源组CAR-T细胞于21 d消失,人源化CAR-T细胞至35 d消失;生存期分析,对照组于治疗后20 d全部死亡,鼠源组裸鼠于治疗后25 d全部死亡,人源化组裸鼠于治疗后53 d全部死亡.结论 人源化与鼠源CD19 CAR-T细胞相比,其增殖活性强、杀伤活性高、体内存留时间长,提示人源化CD19 CAR-T在B细胞淋巴瘤治疗的临床疗效将优于鼠源CD19 CAR-T.

更多

abstractsObjective To investigate the different functions of humanized and murinized CD19 chimeric antigen receptor ( CAR)-T cells against Raji cell line in vitro and in vivo. Methods Peripheral blood samples were collected from eight patients with lymphoma who were going to receive CD19 CAR-T cell therapy and used for the preparation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells ( PBMC) as well as humanized and murinized CAR-T cells. Cell proliferation and cytotoxicity were detected with CCK-8 and LDH assays, respectively. A tumor-bearing mouse model was established by injecting BALB/c female nude mice with flu-orescent Raji cells. Changes in tumor volume in these mice were observed by in vivo imaging technology. The transfection efficiency and amount of CAR-T cells in the mice were detected with flow cytometry. Re-sults No statistical difference in transfection efficiency was found between humanized and murinized CAR-T cells, nor in cell proliferation at 24 h of culture in vitro(P=0. 104). The proliferation of humanized CAR-T cells showed a significant increase compared with that of murinized CAR-T cells at 48 h of culture ( P=0. 009). Similarly, the cytotoxicity of the two types of CAR-T cells against Raji cells showed no significant difference at 24 h at any effector/target (E/T) ratio (1 : 1 or 4 : 1), and that of humanized CAR-T cells was higher than that of murinized CAR-T cells at both E/T ratios at 48 h (E/T ratio=1 : 1, P=0. 005;E/T ratio=4 : 1, P=0. 008). Moreover, the cytotoxicity of CAR-T cells was higher than that of PBMC in any case. Tumor volumes in mice were reduced 14 d after humanized or murinized CAR-T cell therapy, while the mice in the PBMC control group suffered tumor progression. Tumor volume began to increase in mice 21 d after murinized CAR-T cell therapy, while no significant change was observed in the mice treated with hu-manized CAR-T cells. All of the mice died 25 d after murinized CAR-T cell therapy, while the deaths among those under humanized CAR-T cell therapy occurred on 31 d. The proportion of CAR-T cells in mice reached the peak 7 d after receiving humanized or murinized CAR-T cell therapy, while that in the humanized group was significantly higher than that in the murinized group at any time point (P4 d=0. 001, P7 d=0. 000, P14 d=0. 003). Murinized CAR-T cells became undetectable on 21 d, while humanized CAR-T cells on 35 d. The maximum survival time for mice in the PBMC and murinized and humanized CAR-T cell groups was 20 d, 25 d and 53 d, respectively. Conclusions Compared with murinized CD19 CAR-T cells, humanized CD19 CAR-T cells showed stronger proliferation potential and cytotoxicity and remained in vivo detectable for a longer period of time. This study indicated that humanized CD19 CAR-T cells were superior to murinized CD19 CAR-T cells for the treatment of B cell lymphoma.

More
广告
作者 孟娟霞 [1] 牟男 [2] 杨振兴 [2] 王嘉 [1] 李新 [1] 江嫣雨 [1] 袁婷 [1] 邓琦 [1] 学术成果认领
作者单位 天津市第一中心医院血液科 300192 [1] 上海吉倍生物技术有限公司 201203 [2]
栏目名称 基础免疫学
DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5101.2019.09.004
发布时间 2019-10-30
  • 浏览132
  • 下载113
中华微生物学和免疫学杂志

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷