• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

内镜下乳头括约肌小切开联合球囊扩张治疗胆总管结石的随机对照研究

Small endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for common bile duct stones:a randomized controlled study

摘要目的:评价经内镜乳头括约肌小切开术( SEST)联合内镜下球囊扩张术( EPBD)治疗胆总管结石的疗效和安全性,并探讨其对胆道压力的影响。方法152例患者采用电脑随机单双号原则随机分成2组,观察组85例行SEST联合EPBD取石,对照组67例行SEST取石,比较2组一次性取净结石成功率、手术前后胆道压力测量值、并发症总体发生率及随访胆道压力测量值。结果152例均顺利完成内镜治疗和测压操作。一次性结石取净率组间差异无统计学意义[92?94%(79/85)比95?52%(64/67),P=0?746]。2组内镜治疗后Oddi括约肌基础压(SOBP)、胆总管内压( CBDP )较术前均有明显下降( P<0?05),且观察组术后 SOBP 低于对照组[(31?0±11?5) mmHg (1mmHg=0?133 kPa)比(37?6±12?3)mmHg,P>0?05],术后 CBDP 亦低于对照组[(16?3±10?2)mmHg比(19?8±13?1)mmHg,P>0?05]。术后并发症总体发生率观察组与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义[6?33%(5/79)比4?69%(3/64),P=0?953]。143例一次性结石取净的患者随访3~21个月,29例失访,其余114例术后3个月复查了胆道压力,SOBP和CBDP在观察组与对照组间差异均无统计学意义( P>0?05)。结论 SEST联合EPBD治疗胆总管结石安全有效,有利于降低胆道压力,可以保护胆道括约肌功能。

更多

abstractsObjective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of small endoscopic sphincterotomy com?bined with endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for common bile duct stones, and to investigate their effects on the biliary pressure. Methods A total of 152 patients were randomly divided into experimental group (n=67)who underwent SEST and the control group (n=85)who underwent SEST+EPBD according to odd and even numbers randomly generated by a computer. Success rate of a one?time stone removal, biliary pres?sure measurements before and after surgery, the total incidence of complications and bile duct pressure meas?urements during follow?up were compared between the two groups. Results All 152 cases successfully com?pleted manometry and endoscopic treatment operations. There was no significant difference in the rate of one?time stone removal between the two groups[92?94% (79/85) VS 95?52% (64/67), P=0?746]; SOBP and CBDP after endoscopic treatment compared with those before operation decreased significantly ( P<0?05) . SOBP in the experiment group was lower than that in the control group [ 31?0 ± 11?5 mmHg (1 mmHg=0?133 kPa) VS 37?6 ± 12?3 mmHg, P>0?05] after the treatment, and CBDP was also lower than that in the control group(16?3 ± 10?2 mmHg VS 19?8 ±13?1 mmHg, P>0?05) after the treatment. There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of postoperative complications[6?33% (5/79) VS 4?69% (3/64), P=0?953]. There were 143 cases (9 cases of secondary endoscopic were excluded) which were followed up for 3 to 21 months, 29 cases lost. Postoperative biliary pressure in 114 patients were&nbsp;reviewed, and there was no significant difference in the SOBP(P>0?05)and CBDP between the two groups ( P>0?05) . Conclusion SEST combined with EPBD treatment of common bile duct stones is safe and ef?fective, which helps to reduce biliary pressure and to protect biliary sphincter function.

More
广告
  • 浏览203
  • 下载169
中华消化内镜杂志

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷