医学文献 >>
  • 检索发现
  • 增强检索
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
默认
×
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

基于深度学习的肺结节分类分割算法及其在不同CT重建算法下的效能评估

A deep learning-based lung nodule density classification and segmentation method and its effectiveness under different CT reconstruction algorithms

摘要目的:构建一种基于深度学习的肺结节分类以及分割算法,探究其在不同CT重建算法下的诊断效能。方法:回顾性收集2019年6至9月天津医科大学朱宪彝纪念医院放射科363例胸部CT平扫影像学资料,每例患者的胸部CT平扫均包含三种CT重建算法(肺重建、纵隔重建、骨重建)生成的图像,这些数据构成了模型的测试集;模型的训练集由公开数据集(LIDC-IDRI)和私有数据集共4 185例患者胸部CT图像组成。模型的构建采用3D深度卷积神经网络和递归神经网络结合的方式,在多任务联合学习下训练肺结节密度类型分类和分割,最后将训练好的模型在天津医科大学朱宪彝纪念医院放射科363例测试病例上进行效果测试,得到三种CT图像重建算法下结节分类准确率和分割Dice系数指标。采用方差分析对三种CT重建算法下的结节分类准确率和分割Dice系数进行比较以分析差异是否有统计学意义。结果:在三种CT重建算法下,模型对肺结节密度类型的分类准确率分别为98.67%±5.70%、98.38%±6.61% 和97.89%±7.32%,其中实性结节的分类准确率分别为98.79%±5.58%、98.49%±6.89%和97.90%±7.41%,亚实性结节的分类准确率分别为97.57%±10.19%、98.52%±7.77%和98.52%±7.77%,三种不同重建算法下的肺结节的分类准确率差异无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。三种重建算法下,所有结节分割的Dice系数分别为79.87%±5.78%、79.02%±6.04%和79.31%±5.95%,三组间结节分割的Dice系数差异无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。 结论:结合了3D卷积神经网络和递归神经网络的深度学习算法,对不同CT重建算法图像中肺结节的分类和分割均有较为稳定的效果。

更多

abstractsObjective:To evaluate the diagnostic value of the lung nodule classification and segmentation algorithm based on deep learning among different CT reconstruction algorithms.Methods:Chest CT of 363 patients from June 2019 to September 2019 in Radiology Department of Tianjin Medical University Chu Hsien-I Memorial Hospital were retrospectively collected in this study, each of which consisted of images by three different reconstruction methods (lung reconstruction, mediastinal reconstruction, bone reconstruction).These collected data were used as testing set and a total of 4 185 Chest CTs including the public data set and the constructed private data set were used as the training set. A model combines 3D deep convolutional neural network and recurrent neural network under a multi-task joint learning algorithm for lung nodule classification and segmentation were constructed. The well-trained method was tested on 363 test cases using two metrics, i.e., the accuracy of the density classification and the Dice coefficient of nodule segmentation. The performances under three reconstruction methods were statistically analyzed according to the variance analysis among three different reconstruction methods.Results:The average classification accuracies of the nodule under three reconstruction methods were 98.67%±5.70%, 98.38%±6.61% and 97.89%±7.32%. Specifically, the accuracies of the solid nodules under three reconstruction methods were 98.79%±5.58%, 98.49%±6.89% and 97.90%±7.41% and the accuracies of the sub-solid nodules were 97.57%±10.19%, 98.52%±7.77% and 98.52%±7.77%. There was no significant difference in the classification accuracy of pulmonary nodules under three different reconstruction algorithms (all P>0.05). The average Dice coefficients of nodule segmentation was 79.87%±5.78%, 79.02%±6.04% and 79.31%±5.95%. There was no significant difference in the average Dice coefficients of nodule segmentation under three different reconstruction algorithms (all P>0.05). Conclusion:Deep learning algorithm which combined with 3D convolutional neural network and recurrent neural network has demonstrated relatively stable in classification and segmentation of lung nodules under different CT reconstruction method.

More
广告
作者 孟祥鹿 [1] 幸子健 [2] 卢山 [1] 学术成果认领
作者单位 天津医科大学朱宪彝纪念医院放射科 天津市内分泌研究所 国家卫生健康委员会激素与发育重点实验室 天津市代谢性疾病重点实验室,天津 300134 [1] 深睿医疗人工智能研究院,北京 100080 [2]
DOI 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20201123-03171
发布时间 2026-03-17(万方平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)
  • 浏览588
  • 下载497
中华医学杂志

中华医学杂志

2021年101卷7期

476-480页

MEDLINEISTICPKUCSCDCA

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

法律状态公告日 法律状态 法律状态信息

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new医文AI 翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷