医学文献 >>
  • 检索发现
  • 增强检索
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
默认
×
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

微等离子束技术与铒激光像束模式治疗陈旧性烧伤瘢痕的疗效比较

Comparison of effectiveness between micro-plasma technology and 2940 nm Er ∶ YAG laser in treatment of burn scar

摘要目的 评价微等离子束技术(micro-plasma technology,MPT)与铒激光像束模式(2940 nm Er∶YAG laser)治疗陈旧性轻度和中度烧伤瘢痕的临床疗效、适应证及不良反应.方法 265例随机分为2组,MPT组136例,Er∶YAG组129例.分别治疗2~6次.结果 MPT组与Er∶YAG组的有效率分别为73.52%和44.95%,治愈率分别为28.67%和15.50%,两组总体疗效比较,差异有统计学意义,其中172例轻度瘢痕患者,MPT组与Er∶YAG组的有效率分别为78.52%和67.09 %;MPT组疗效虽略优于Er∶YAG组,但差异无统计学意义;93例中度瘢痕患者,MPT组与Er∶YAG组的有效率分别为62.79%和10.00%,MPT组疗效显著优于Er∶YAG组,两组比较差异有统计学意义.结论 MPT和Er∶YAG治疗轻度烧伤瘢痕均有可靠疗效,且不良反应小.治疗中度瘢痕MPT的疗效显著优于Er∶YAG.

更多

abstractsObjective To compare the effectiveness,indications and side effect between microplasma technology (MPT) and 2940 nm Er ∶ YAG laser for treatment of burn scar.Methods 265 patients with hypertrophic scar were treated with MPT (MPT group,N=136) and Er ∶ YAG laser (Er ∶ YAG laser group,N=129).The patients were treated 2-6 times.Results The significant response rate was 73.52 % and 44.95 % in MPT group and Er ∶ YAG laser group; the cure rate was 28.67 % and 15.50 % in MPT group and Er ∶ YAG group,respectively.There was no statistically significant difference between two groups (P>0.05).For moderate burn scar patients (93 cases),the significant response rate was 62.79 % and 10.00 % in MPT group and Er ∶ YAG laser group,respectively.There was significant difference between two groups (P<0.05).Conclusions MPT and Er ∶ YAG laser has been proven to be effective and safe for the treatment of burn scar.The effectiveness of MPT is superior to Er ∶ YAG laser in treatment of moderate burn scar.

More
广告
栏目名称
DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0290.2013.04.009
发布时间 2013-10-24(万方平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)
  • 浏览403
  • 下载190
中华医学美学美容杂志

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new医文AI 翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷