• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献>>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

Qingchang suppositry(清肠栓)induced remission in patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative proctitis:a multicenter,prospective,randomized,parallel-controlled clinical trial

摘要OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Qingchang suppository(清肠栓,QCS),a preparation of Chinese herbal medicine,in the induction of remission in patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative proctitis(UP).METHODS:We performed a multicenter,prospective,randomized,parallel-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of QCS induction therapy in 140 adult patients with mild-to-moderate UP and TCM syndrome of dampness-heat in large intestine.The patients were randomized to receive QCS(study group)or Salicylazosulfapyridine(SASP)suppository(control group)one piece each time,twice a day,per anum for 12 weeks.Mayo score and main symptoms score were evaluated at weeks 0,2,4,8 and 12,rectosigmoidscopy was taken at weeks 0,4,8 and 12,Geboes score,erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR),C-reactive protein(CRP)and safety indexes were assessed at weeks 0 and 12.The primary efficacy endpoint is clinical remission rate,the secondary efficacy endpoints are clinical response rate,mucosa healing rate,Geboes score,the remission rates of the main symptoms,the median day to the remission of the symptom,etc.RESULTS:There were no statistical difference in the clinical remission rates,the clinical response rates,the mucosa healing rates,Geboes score,ESR and CRP between the two groups.The remission rates of tenesmus and anal burning sensation of the study group were significantly higher than those of the control group(76.5%vs 25.0%,P=0.009;74.51%vs 29.63%,P=0.003).The median day to the remission of purulent bloody stool of the study group was significantly less than that of control group[11(1,64)vs 19(2,67),P=0.007].The patients receiving QCS had a significantly higher mucosa healing rate at week 4 than the patients receiving SASP suppository(71.42%vs 52.85%,P=0.023).No adverse event occurred in the study group while the adverse events incidence of the control group was 5.7%(P=0.049).CONCLUSIONS:QCS could induce the remission of UP as effectively and safely as SASP suppository,and was superior to SASP suppository in relieving the symptoms of tenesmus,anal burning sensation and purulent bloody stool and the time to reach mucosa healing.

更多
广告
作者 DAI Xiaoling [1] ZHANG Anming [2] LIN Hui [3] SHI Bei [1] REN Yi [2] WEN Hongzhu [1] FEI Xiaoyan [1] LIN Jiang [1] 学术成果认领
作者单位 Department of Gastroenterology,Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 200032,China [1] Department of Gastroenterology,Shanghai Putuo Traditional Chinese Medicine hospital,Shanghai 200063,China [2] Department of Protocology,Shanghai Tianshan Traditional Chinese Medicine hospital,Shanghai 200050,China [3]
栏目名称 Original Articles
DOI 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20231121.004
发布时间 2024-04-10
提交
  • 浏览6
  • 下载0
中医杂志(英文版)

中医杂志(英文版)

2024年44卷1期

156-162页

SCIMEDLINECSCDCA

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷