医学文献 >>
  • 检索发现
  • 增强检索
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
默认
×
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

术后疼痛管理质量评价指标体系的构建

Construction of a postoperative pain management quality evaluation index system

摘要目的:构建术后疼痛管理质量评价指标体系,旨在为医院评价术后疼痛管理质量提供有效工具。方法:2017年8月—2018年12月以Donabedian理论为指导,通过文献研究法构建原始指标,通过小组讨论法构建初级指标,采用德尔菲专家咨询法对15名术后疼痛管理专家展开2轮咨询,构建最终指标,并通过层次分析法确定指标权重。结果:构建的术后疼痛管理质量评价指标体系包含3项一级指标、8项二级指标和32项三级指标。结构、过程和结果3项一级指标的权重分别为0.2、0.4、0.4;二级指标中组合权重占前3位的分别为镇痛效果(0.266 7)、疼痛评估与再评估(0.160 0)、镇痛治疗(0.160 0);三级指标中组合权重占前3位的是中重度活动性疼痛发生率(0.143 9)、中重度静息痛发生率(0.079 2)、镇痛健康教育充分率(0.073 0)。2轮咨询问卷的有效回收率均为100%,专家的积极系数为100%,权威系数为0.915,2轮专家咨询的肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.21、0.25( P<0.01)。 结论:本研究构建的术后疼痛管理质量评价指标体系内容全面、科学合理,能体现术后疼痛管理多环节及多学科合作的特点,可在临床推广使用。

更多

abstractsObjective:To construct a postoperative pain management quality evaluation index system so as to provide an effective tool for postoperative pain management quality by hospital.Methods:From August 2017 to December 2018, original indexes were built based on Donabedian theory and literature research method, and primary indexes were constructed by group discussion. Delphi method was used to two rounds of consultation among 15 postoperative pain management experts to set up the final indexes, and index weight was defined with the analytic hierarchy process.Results:The postoperative pain management quality evaluation index system included 3 first-level indexes, 8 second-level indexes and 32 third-level indexes. The weights of 3 first-level indexes (structure, process and outcome) were 0.2, 0.4 and 0.4 respectively. Top 3 combined weights of second-level included the antalgic effect (0.266 7) , pain evaluation and re-evaluation (0.160 0) , antalgic therapy (0.160 0) . Top 3 combined weights of third-level included the incidence of moderate-severe active pain (0.143 9) , incidence of moderate-severe rest pain (0.079 2) and the sufficient rate of antalgic health education (0.073 0) . The Kendall coefficient of concordance of two rounds of expert consultation were 0.21 and 0.25 with statistical differences ( P<0.01) . Conclusions:The postoperative pain management quality evaluation index system the has all-round, scientific and reasonable content and can reflect the characteristics of multi-link and multidisciplinary cooperation of postoperative pain management which is worthy of clinical promotion.

More
广告
  • 浏览436
  • 下载435
中华现代护理杂志

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

法律状态公告日 法律状态 法律状态信息

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序
new医文AI 翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷