• 医学文献
  • 知识库
  • 评价分析
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批
论文 期刊
取消
高级检索

检索历史 清除

医学文献 >>
  • 全部
  • 中外期刊
  • 学位
  • 会议
  • 专利
  • 成果
  • 标准
  • 法规
知识库 >>
  • 临床诊疗知识库
  • 中医药知识库
评价分析 >>
  • 机构
  • 作者
热搜词:
换一批

迭代重建对前置门控冠状动脉CT图像质量及辐射剂量的影响

Application of iterative reconstruction in prospective electrocardiography-triggered CT coronary angiography

摘要:

目的 探讨256层螺旋CT前置门控冠状动脉CTA成像中应用迭代重建时,与常规剂量滤波反投影(FBP)重组图像质量相当的最适低剂量水平.方法 120例拟行冠状动脉CTA检查者按照同期随机原则分为4组,每组30例.A组(对照组)采用常规剂量前置门控扫描及FBP重组,B~D组为低剂量组,采用逐级降低管电流的方式使辐射剂量较A组分别降低50%、60%、70%,并采用相应等级的迭代重建.采用方差分析比较各组客观评价指标(噪声、对比噪声比)及辐射剂量(CT剂量指数、CT剂量长度乘积、有效辐射剂量)的差异.采用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较各组主观图像质量评分(管腔对比度、边缘锐利度、主观噪声及图像总体质量,采用4分法).利用ROC曲线确定能维持图像质量等同于A组的最适低剂量组.结果 低剂量B~D组噪声为33.2~ 36.0 HU,低于常规剂量A组(37.4 HU),但差异无统计学意义(F=1.48,P=0.22).B~D组对比噪声比为15.3~16.5,高于A组(15.0±2.3),但各组间差异无统计学意义(F=1.70,P=0.17).B、C组显示了很好的主观图像质量,各项主观评分均≥3分,与A组(主观评分均≥3分)差异无统计学意义(P=0.31 ~ 1.00).D组血管边缘锐利度及总体图像质量(2分均有3例)下降,与A组(均无2分)差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).ROC曲线显示,C组为维持图像质量等同于常规剂量的最适低剂量组,曲线下面积为0.76,95%可信区间为0.65 ~0.87.该组有效辐射剂量值为(1.2±0.1)mSv,较A组剂量(3.1±0.6)降低约61%.结论 迭代重建可以显著降低噪声,在剂量降低61%的条件下仍可得到与常规剂量FBP重组相当的图像质量.由此,可使患者的冠状动脉CTA辐射剂量降至1.2 mSv.

更多
abstracts:

Objective To assess the image quality (IQ) of an iterative reconstruction (IR) technique (iDose4) from prospective electrocardiography (ECG)-triggered coronary CTA on a 256 MSCT scanner and determine the optimal dose reduction using IR that can provide IQ comparable to filtered back projection (FBP).Methods Prospectively ECG gated CCTA were performed on 120 patients [76 men,44 women; age:(53 ± 10)y] using a 256-slice MSCT (Brilliance iCT,Philips Healthcare).The control group (Group A,n =30) were scanned using the conventional tube output (120 kVp,210 mAs) and reconstructed using FBP.The other 3 groups were scanned with the same kVp but successively reduced tube output as follows:B (n =30):105 mAs,C (n =30):84 mAs:D (n =30):65 mAs and reconstructed using IR levels of L4 to L6,respectively.All images were reconstructed using the same kernel (XCB).Two radiologists graded IQ in a blinded fashion on a 4-point scale (4-excellent,3-good,2-fair and 1-poor).Quantitative measurements of CT values,image noise,Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were obtained in each group.Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparisons of objective evaluation indices (noise,CNR) and radiation dose (CTDIvol,DLP,ED) between the four groups.The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparisons of demographic data and for detection of differences in subjective evaluation of IQ among groups.A level of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.A ROC analysis was performed to determine a radiation reduction threshold up to which excellent IQ was maintained.Results There was no significant differences in objective noise among Groups A (37.4 ±7.9) HU,B(33.2±7.1) HU,C(35.7±9.8) HU,and D(36.0±6.8) HU (F=1.48,P=0.22).There was no significant differences in CNR among Groups A(15.0 ±2.3),B(16.5 ±3.6),C(16.3 ±3.5),and D(15.3±2.8) (F=1.70,P =0.17).Group B and C had good and excellent scores of the subjective IQ (≥3),and there was no significant differences in the scores of the subjective IQ between Group A,and Groups B,C (P =0.30-1.00).Significant differences in image sharpness and study acceptability were observed between groups A and D (P < 0.01).Using the criterion of excellent IQ (score 4),the ROC curve of dose levels and IQ acceptability established a reduction of 60% of tube output (Group C) as optimum cutoff point (AUC:0.76,95% CI:0.65-0.87).The effective dose (ED) of Group C was 61% lower than that of Group A,(1.2 ± 0.1) mSv vs.(3.1 ± 0.6) mSv.Conclusion Iterative reconstruction techniques can provide 61% ED reduction in prospectively-triggered coronary CTA using 256-slice MSCT while maintaining excellent image quality.

More
作者: 侯阳 [1] 于兵 [1] 郭启勇 [1] 王玉科 [1] 余美 [1]
期刊: 《中华放射学杂志》2013年47卷4期 305-309页 MEDLINEISTICPKUCSCD
栏目名称: CT低剂量扫描
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2013.04.004
发布时间: 2013-05-30
基金项目:
辽宁省教育厅创新团队基金资助项目 沈阳市科学技术项目计划资助项目
  • 浏览:528
  • 下载:448

加载中!

相似文献

  • 中文期刊
  • 外文期刊
  • 学位论文
  • 会议论文

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

加载中!

扩展文献

特别提示:本网站仅提供医学学术资源服务,不销售任何药品和器械,有关药品和器械的销售信息,请查阅其他网站。

  • 客服热线:4000-115-888 转3 (周一至周五:8:00至17:00)

  • |
  • 客服邮箱:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn

  • 违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

官方微信
万方医学小程序

北京万方数据股份有限公司

万方数据电子出版社

京ICP证010071号

京公网安备11010802020237号

京ICP备08100800号-1

违法和不良信息举报电话:4000-115-888,举报邮箱:problem@wanfangdata.com.cn,举报专区

new翻译 充值 订阅 收藏 移动端

官方微信

万方医学小程序

使用
帮助
Alternate Text
调查问卷